A Theory of Critical Elections: V.O. Key 1955. (n.d.). http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2126401
Abendschon, S., & Steinmetz, S. (2014). The Gender Gap in Voting Revisited: Women’s Party Preferences in a European Context. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 21(2), 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxu009
Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., Blais, A., Diamond, M., Diskin, A., Indridason, I. H., Lee, D. J., & Levine, R. (2010). Comparing Strategic Voting Under FPTP and PR. Comparative Political Studies, 43(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009341717
Achen, C. H., Bartels, L. M., & Ebooks Corporation. (2016). Democracy for realists: why elections do not produce responsive government: Vol. Princeton studies in political behavior. Princeton University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=4398651
Achterberg, P. (2006). Class Voting in the New Political Culture. International Sociology, 21(2), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580906061378
Adams, J. (n.d.). Party competition and responsible party government: a theory of spatial competition based upon insights from behavioral voting research. University of Michigan Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.23030
Anderson, C. J. (2007). The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.050806.155344
Bahador, B., Kemp, G., McMillan, K., & Rudd, C. (Eds.). (2016). Politics and the media (Second edition). Auckland University Press.
Basic Content Analysis - Oxford Scholarship - acprof-9780190215491-chapter-2. (n.d.). https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.001.0001/acprof-9780190215491-chapter-2?print=pdf
Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nadeau, R., & Nevitte, N. (2003). Campaign Dynamics in the 2000 Canadian Election: How the Leader Debates Salvaged the Conservative Party. Political Science and Politics, 36(01), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096503001677
Bornschier, S. (2010). The New Cultural Divide and the Two-Dimensional Political Space in Western Europe. West European Politics, 33(3), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402381003654387
Brandenburg, H., & Van Egmond, M. (2012). Pressed into Party Support? Media Influence on Partisan Attitudes during the 2005 UK General Election Campaign. British Journal of Political Science, 42(02), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000445
Brians, C. L. (2005). Women for Women? American Politics Research, 33(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X04269415
Brooks, C., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Manza, J. (2006). Cleavage-based voting behavior in cross-national perspective: evidence from six postwar democracies. Social Science Research, 35(1), 88–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.06.005
Building Consensus: The News Media’ s Agenda-Setting Roles - 105846097199236. (n.d.). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/105846097199236?needAccess=true
Campbell, R., & Erzeel, S. (2018). Exploring Gender Differences in Support for Rightist Parties: The Role of Party and Gender Ideology. Politics & Gender, 14(01), 80–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X17000599
Can Populism Be Defended? William Riker, Gerry Mackie and the Interpretation of Democracy - 44483157.pdf. (n.d.). https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44483157.pdf?refreqid=excelsior:0645628957f2ed2e8910a0aa956c00a6
CHARNEY, E., & ENGLISH, W. (2012). Candidate Genes and Political Behavior. American Political Science Review, 106(01), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000554
Citizen politics : public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies / Russell J. Dalton, University of California, Irvine. - 64VUW. (n.d.-a).
Citizen politics : public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies / Russell J. Dalton, University of California, Irvine. - 64VUW. (n.d.-b).
Citizen politics : public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies / Russell J. Dalton, University of California, Irvine. - 64VUW. (n.d.-c).
Converse, P. E. (2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650
Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015). The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124
Crooked Hillary and Dumb Trump. (n.d.). https://benjamins.com/catalog/ip.00004.hof/fulltext/ip.00004.hof.pdf
Curran, J., Coen, S., Soroka, S., Aalberg, T., Hayashi, K., Hichy, Z., Iyengar, S., Jones, P., Mazzoleni, G., Papathanassopoulos, S., Rhee, J. W., Rojas, H., Rowe, D., & Tiffen, R. (2014). Reconsidering ‘virtuous circle’ and ‘media malaise’ theories of the media: An 11-nation study. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 15(7), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913520198
Dalton, R. J. (2009). Economics, environmentalism and party alignments: A note on partisan change in advanced industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 48(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00831.x
Dalton, R. J. (2014a). Citizen politics: public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (Sixth edition). SAGE, CQ Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2014b). Citizen politics: public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (Sixth edition). SAGE, CQ Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2014c). Citizen politics: public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (Sixth edition). SAGE, CQ Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2020). Citizen politics: public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. In Chapter 11: Political Representation (Seventh edition). SAGE, CQ Press.
Dalton, R. J., & Anderson, C. J. (2010). Citizens, Context, and Choice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599233.001.0001
Distorting the News? The Mechanisms of Partisan Media Bias and Its Effects on News Production - s11109-019-09551-y.pdf. (n.d.). https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11109-019-09551-y.pdf
Do Polls Influence the Vote? (n.d.). https://www.press.umich.edu/pdf/0472099213-ch11.pdf
Dobrzynska, A. (2003). Do the Media Have a Direct Impact on the Vote? The Case of the 1997 Canadian Election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/15.1.27
Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate? - 2082710.pdf. (n.d.). https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2082710.pdf?refreqid=excelsior:e548bd20b3f827e841623fe145b7adbf
Dowling, C. M., & Krupnikov, Y. (2016). The Effects of Negative Advertising. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.51
Druckman, J. N. (2004). Priming the Vote: Campaign Effects in a U.S. Senate Election. Political Psychology, 25(4), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00388.x
Economic Voting - Political Science - Oxford Bibliographies. (n.d.). http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756223/obo-9780199756223-0057.xml
Edited by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. (n.d.-a). Broadcasting versus Narrowcasting: Do Mass Media Exist in the Twenty-First Century? In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199793471-e-62
Edited by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. (n.d.-b). Political Advertising. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199793471-e-004
Edited by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. (n.d.-c). Political Campaign Debates. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199793471-e-007
Edited by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. (n.d.-d). The Media Agenda: Who (or What) Sets It? In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199793471-e-37
Edited by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. (n.d.-e). Theories of Media Bias. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199793471-e-44
Edited by Russell J. Dalton and Hans‐Dieter Klingemann. (n.d.). Economic Models of Voting. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199270125-e-027
Effects of presidential debate watching and ideology on attitudes and knowledge. (n.d.). 34, 163–172. https://search.proquest.com/docview/203263700/fulltextPDF/9A1DC6916E0B4527PQ/1?accountid=14782
Emmenegger, P., & Manow, P. (2014). Religion and the Gender Vote Gap. Politics & Society, 42(2), 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213519419
Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802
Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02328.x
Evans, Geoffrey and Tilley, James. (n.d.). How Parties Shape Class Politics: Explaining the Decline of the Class Basis of Party Support. British Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 137–161. http://search.proquest.com/docview/907179060?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14782
Fisher, S. D., Heath, A. F., Sanders, D., & Sobolewska, M. (2015). Candidate Ethnicity and Vote Choice in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 45(04), 883–905. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000562
Flanagan, T. (2014). Winning power: Canadian campaigning in the twenty-first century. McGill-Queen’s University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=3332673
Gender, populist attitudes, and voting: explaining the gender gap in voting for populist radical right and populist radical left parties - 01402382.2017.1287448. (n.d.). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01402382.2017.1287448?needAccess=true
Gibbons, Matthew. (n.d.). New Zealand Political Parties’ Policies. New Zealand Sociology, 26(1), 41–67. https://tewaharoa.victoria.ac.nz/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest874476805&context=PC&vid=VUWNUI〈=en_US&search_scope=64VUW_ALL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=all&query=any,contains,party%20policies%20in%20new%20zealand%20politics&sortby=rank&offset=0
Gibson, R. K., & Römmele, A. (2009). Measuring the Professionalization of Political Campaigning. Party Politics, 15(3), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809102245
Gibson, R., & Römmele, A. (2001). Changing Campaign Communications: A Party-Centered Theory of Professionalized Campaigning. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(4), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/108118001129172323
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Correa, T., & Valenzuela, S. (2012a). Selective Exposure to Cable News and Immigration in the U.S.: The Relationship Between FOX News, CNN, and Attitudes Toward Mexican Immigrants. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732138
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Correa, T., & Valenzuela, S. (2012b). Selective Exposure to Cable News and Immigration in the U.S.: The Relationship Between FOX News, CNN, and Attitudes Toward Mexican Immigrants. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732138
Happy 80th Birthday National Party - YouTube. (n.d.). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MltDv8znwJ4&feature=youtu.be
Harsgor, L. (2018). The Partisan Gender Gap in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy013
Haselmayer, M. (2019). Negative campaigning and its consequences: a review and a look ahead. French Politics, 17(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-019-00084-8
Haselmayer, M., & Jenny, M. (2018). Negative campaigning among coalition partners. Research & Politics, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018796911
HEALY, A. J., PERSSON, M., & SNOWBERG, E. (2017). Digging into the Pocketbook: Evidence on Economic Voting from Income Registry Data Matched to a Voter Survey. American Political Science Review, 111(04), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000314
Heath, A. F., Fisher, S. D., Rosenblatt, G., Sanders, D., & Sobolewska, M. (2013). Voting, Abstention, and Defection. In The Political Integration of Ethnic Minorities in Britain (pp. 154–170). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656639.003.0008
Holbrook, T. M. (2002). Presidential Campaigns and the Knowledge Gap. Political Communication, 19(4), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600290109997
Huber, J. D. (2012). Measuring Ethnic Voting: Do Proportional Electoral Laws Politicize Ethnicity? American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 986–1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00601.x
Hufer, AnkeKornadt, Anna ElenaKandler, ChristianRiemann, Rainer. (n.d.). Genetic and environmental variation in political orientation in adolescence and early adulthood: A Nuclear Twin Family analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 373–387. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2249962459?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14782
Ian Budge. (n.d.). The standard left-right dimension. https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/down/papers/budge_right-left-scale.pdf
Ian McAllister, ’Bandwagon, underdog, or projection? Opinion polls and electoral choice in Britain, 1979–1987’. (n.d.). https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2131577
In Their Own Words: Political Practitioner Accounts of Candidates, Audience... (2018). Political Communication. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=127494968&site=ehost-live
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). The Gender Gap in Voting and Public Opinion. In Rising Tide (pp. 75–100). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550362.005
Jeffrey A. Karp, Susan A. Banducci and Shaun Bowler. (2008). Getting out the Vote: Party Mobilization in a Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 91–112. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27568334?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Justin Fisher, , Edward Fieldhouse, , Mark N. Franklin, , Rachel Gibson, , Marta Cantijoch, , and Christopher Wlezien. (2017a). The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/VUW/reader.action?docID=5207628&ppg=410
Justin Fisher, , Edward Fieldhouse, , Mark N. Franklin, , Rachel Gibson, , Marta Cantijoch, , and Christopher Wlezien. (2017b). The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/VUW/reader.action?docID=5207628&ppg=381
Justin Fisher, , Edward Fieldhouse, , Mark N. Franklin, , Rachel Gibson, , Marta Cantijoch, , and Christopher Wlezien. (2017c). The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/VUW/reader.action?docID=5207628&ppg=397
Justin Fisher, , Edward Fieldhouse, , Mark N. Franklin, , Rachel Gibson, , Marta Cantijoch, , and Christopher Wlezien. (2017d). The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/VUW/reader.action?docID=5207628&ppg=79
Justin Fisher, , Edward Fieldhouse, , Mark N. Franklin, , Rachel Gibson, , Marta Cantijoch, , and Christopher Wlezien. (2017e). The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=5207628&ppg=211
Justin Fisher, , Edward Fieldhouse, , Mark N. Franklin, , Rachel Gibson, , Marta Cantijoch, , and Christopher Wlezien. (2017f). The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=5207628&ppg=236
Justin Fisher, , Edward Fieldhouse, , Mark N. Franklin, , Rachel Gibson, , Marta Cantijoch, , and Christopher Wlezien. (2017g). The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=5207628&ppg=236
Karp, J. A., Vowles, J., Banducci, S. A., & Donovan, T. (2002). Strategic voting, party activity, and candidate effects: testing explanations for split voting in New Zealand’s new mixed system. Electoral Studies, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00031-7
KAYSER, M. A., & PERESS, M. (2012). Benchmarking across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison. American Political Science Review, 106(03), 661–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000275
Lago, I., Bermúdez, S., Guinjoan, M., & Simón, P. (2018). Turnout and social fractionalisation. Politics, 38(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395716686598
Leaders’ debate, 2002. (n.d.). https://teara.govt.nz/en/video/35758/leaders-debate-2002
LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G., & Norris, P. (2010). Comparing democracies 3: elections and voting in the 21st century ([3rd ed.]). SAGE.
LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G., & Norris, P. (Eds.). (2014). Comparing democracies 4: elections and voting in a changing world. SAGE. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=5164463&ppg=113
Llaudet, E. (2018). The mobilizing and demobilizing effects of political TV ads: A midterm election study. Electoral Studies, 54, 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.06.002
Lockhart, M. & Taylor & Francis. (2018). President Donald Trump and his political discourse: ramifications of rhetoric via Twitter. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351038782
Lupia, Arthur. (n.d.). Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. The American Political Science Review (1927); Washington, D.C., Etc., 88(1). http://search.proquest.com/docview/1304796566?rfr_id=info:xri/sid:primo
Manza, J., & Brooks, C. (1998). The Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections: When? Why? Implications? American Journal of Sociology, 103(5), 1235–1266. https://doi.org/10.1086/231352
Mass Media Effects: Mobilization or Media Malaise? - 194239.pdf. (n.d.). https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/194239.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A87eb49501b7ed74ad4b75057771d64be
McCombs, M. E. & Ebooks Corporation. (2014). Setting the agenda: the mass media and public opinion (Second edition). Polity Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=1631739
Media Malaise and the Decline of Legitimacy: Any Room for Good News? - Oxford Scholarship - oso-9780198793717-chapter-6. (n.d.). https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780198793717.001.0001/oso-9780198793717-chapter-6?print=pdf
Mellon, J., Evans, G., Fieldhouse, E. A., Green, J., & Prosser, C. mname. (2018). Opening the Can of Worms: Most Existing Studies of Aggregate Level Turnout are Meaningless. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3098436
Milazzo, Moser, Scheiner: Social Diversity Affects the Number of Parties: October 2015. (n.d.). http://cpd.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Milazzo-Moser-Scheiner-Social-Diversity-Affects-the-Nbr-of-Ptys-for-UCB-October-2015-1.pdf
MONDAK, J. J., HIBBING, M. V., CANACHE, D., SELIGSON, M. A., & ANDERSON, M. R. (2010). Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior. American Political Science Review, 104(01), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990359
Mutz, D. C. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), E4330–E4339. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115
Norpoth, H., Sidman, A. H., & Suong, C. H. (2013). The New Deal Realignment in Real Time. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12007
Partisan Bias in Message Selection: Media Gatekeeping of Party Press Releases - 10584609.2016.1265619. (n.d.). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10584609.2016.1265619?needAccess=true
Partisan cues and the media: Information flows in the 1992 presidential election. (n.d.). 92, 111–126. https://search.proquest.com/docview/214402856/fulltextPDF/661167E4770E43DEPQ/1?accountid=14782
Peng, Y. (2018). Same Candidates, Different Faces: Uncovering Media Bias in Visual Portrayals of Presidential Candidates with Computer Vision. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 920–941. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy041
Powell, G. B. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy: majoritarian and proportional visions. Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt32bwg8
Race, Ethnicity, and Political Participation: Competing Models and Contrasting Explanations: Jan E. Leighley, and Arnold Vedlitz, 1999. (n.d.). http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2647555
Report of the Inquiry into the 2015 British general election opinion polls. (n.d.). http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/390588/1/Report_final_revised.pdf
Representation: Edmund Burke, Speech to the Electors of Bristol. (n.d.). http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch13s7.html
Richard Johnston, Michael G. Hagen, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. (2004). The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=266540
Schumpeter, J. A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203857090
Shaker, L. (2014). Dead Newspapers and Citizens’ Civic Engagement. Political Communication, 31(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.762817
Sides, J., Tesler, M., & Vavreck, L. (2017). How Trump Lost and Won. Journal of Democracy, 28(2), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0022
Skibba, R. (2016). Pollsters struggle to explain failures of US presidential forecasts. Nature, 539(7629), 339–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20968
SpringerLink (Online service). (2017). Political Communication in Britain: Polling, Campaigning and Media in the 2015 General Election (D. Wring, R. Mortimore, & S. Atkinson, Eds.). Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-40934-4
‘Superior to anything I had seen in the States’: the ‘Thatcherisation’ of R... (2013). Journal of Transatlantic Studies (Springer Nature). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=99106528&site=ehost-live
Technology Firms Shape Political Communication: The Work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google With Campaigns During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Cycle - 10584609.2017.1364814. (n.d.). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814?needAccess=true
Television vs. YouTube: political advertising in the 2012 presidential election - 19331681.2018.1476280. (n.d.). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19331681.2018.1476280?needAccess=true
Tenscher, J., Mykkänen, J., & Moring, T. (2012). Modes of Professional Campaigning. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211433839
The Freedom to Publish Opinion Poll Results, 2012. (n.d.). https://wapor.org/wp-content/uploads/WAPOR_FTP_2012.pdf
The Global Economy, Competency, and the Economic Vote. (2010). Journal of Politics. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=47394180&site=ehost-live
The Irrational Electorate. By: Bartels, Larry M., Wilson Quarterly, 03633276, Autumn2008, Vol. 32, Issue 4. (n.d.). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=31h&AN=34718834&site=ehost-live
The Politics of Advanced Capitalism edited by Pablo Beramendi. (n.d.). https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/the-politics-of-advanced-capitalism/7DDFD56C784EEB3C284098D05BACF104
The Power of Television Images: The First Kennedy-Nixon Debate Revisited - 1468-2508.t01-1-00015.pdf. (n.d.). https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00015.pdf?refreqid=excelsior:7459572f260b24fbc49803b88c24b8a3
The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion (1st ed.). (2017). Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/VUW/detail.action?docID=5207628
The UK’s changing party system: The prospects for a party realignment at Westminster. (n.d.). https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/David%20Sanders.pdf
The West Australian 16 Oct 2019. (16 C.E.). https://www.pressreader.com/australia/the-west-australian/20191016/283089890915773/textview
van der Meer, T. W. G., Hakhverdian, A., & Aaldering, L. (2016). Off the Fence, Onto the Bandwagon? A Large-Scale Survey Experiment on Effect of Real-Life Poll Outcomes on Subsequent Vote Intentions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(1), 46–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edu041
van der Waal, J., Achterberg, P., & Houtman, D. (2007). Class Is Not Dead—It Has Been Buried Alive: Class Voting and Cultural Voting in Postwar Western Societies (1956–1990). Politics & Society, 35(3), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329207304314
Vliegenthart, R. (2012). The Professionalization of Political Communication? A Longitudinal Analysis of Dutch Election Campaign Posters. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211419488
Vowles, J. (2002). Did the Polls Influence the Vote? a Case Study of the 1999 New Zealand General Election. Political Science, 54(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/003231870205400106
Vowles, J. (2004). Voters’ veto: the 2002 election in New Zealand and the consolidation of minority government. Auckland University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=1563885
Vowles, J., Coffé, H., & Curtin, J. (2017a). A Bark But No Bite: Inequality and the 2014 New Zealand General Election. ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/BBNB.08.2017
Vowles, J., Coffé, H., & Curtin, J. (2017b). A Bark But No Bite: Inequality and the 2014 New Zealand General Election. ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/BBNB.08.2017
Vowles, J., Coffé, H., & Curtin, J. (2017c). A Bark But No Bite: Inequality and the 2014 New Zealand General Election. ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/BBNB.08.2017
Vowles, J., Katz, G., & Stevens, D. (2017). Electoral Competitiveness and Turnout in British Elections, 1964–2010. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(04), 775–794. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.67
Why It Is Hard to Find Genes Associated With Social Science Traits: Theoret... (2013). American Journal of Public Health. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104222568&site=ehost-live
Winneg, K., & Jamieson, K. H. (2017). Learning From the 2016 U.S. General Election Presidential Debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(4), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217702770
Wright, Fred Andrew. (n.d.). How Surprising Was Trump’s Victory? Notes on Predictions in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers2.cfm?abstract_id=2900394
Xifra, J. (2011). Americanization, Globalization, or Modernization of Electoral Campaigns? Testing the Situation in Spain. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(6), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211398086
Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2111583
Zaller, J. R. (1998). Monica Lewinsky’s Contribution to Political Science. PS: Political Science and Politics, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/420248
