[1]
B. Majors, ‘Moral Explanation’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00049.x.
[2]
B. Leiter, ‘Moral Facts and Best Explanations’, in Naturalizing jurisprudence: essays on American legal realism and naturalism in legal philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[3]
N. Sinclair, ‘The Explanationist Argument For Moral Realism’, [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1353/cjp.2011.0005?needAccess=true
[4]
U. D. Leibowitz, ‘Scientific Explanation and Moral Explanation*’, Noûs, p. no-no, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00775.x.
[5]
L. ZHONG, ‘A UNIFICATIONIST VINDICATION OF MORAL EXPLANATION’, The Philosophical Forum, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 131–146, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9191.2011.00383.x.
[6]
Elizabeth Tropman, ‘MAKING SENSE OF EXPLANATORY OBJECTIONS TO MORAL REALISM’, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 1, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23460798?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[7]
D. Roberts, ‘Explanatory Indispensability Arguments in Metaethics and Philosophy of Mathematics’. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198778592.001.0001/acprof-9780198778592-chapter-10?print=pdf
[8]
W. FitzPatrick, ‘Scientific Naturalism and the Explanation of Moral Beliefs: Challenging Evolutionary Debunking’, [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118657775.ch27
[9]
K. Vavova, ‘Evolutionary Debunking of Moral Realism’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 104–116, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1111/phc3.12194.
[10]
S. Street, ‘A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value’, Philosophical Studies, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 109–166, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s11098-005-1726-6.
[11]
Richard Joyce, The Evolution of Morality. MIT Press, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=3338603&ppg=192
[12]
R. Das, ‘Evolutionary debunking of morality: epistemological or metaphysical?’, Philosophical Studies, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 417–435, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11098-015-0499-9.
[13]
J. MORTON, ‘A New Evolutionary Debunking Argument Against Moral Realism’, Journal of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 233–253, 2016, doi: 10.1017/apa.2016.14.
[14]
J. Hopster, ‘Evolutionary arguments against moral realism: Why the empirical details matter (and which ones do)’, Biology & Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 5–6, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10539-018-9652-0.
[15]
W. J. FitzPatrick, ‘Debunking evolutionary debunking of ethical realism’, Philosophical Studies, vol. 172, no. 4, pp. 883–904, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11098-014-0295-y.
[16]
J. Olson, ‘What can debunking do for us (sceptics and nihilists)?’, Ratio, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1111/rati.12229.
[17]
T. Cuneo, The normative web: an argument for moral realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[18]
J. Olson, Moral error theory: history, critique, defence, First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[19]
R. Rowland, ‘Moral Error Theory and the Argument from Epistemic Reasons’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–25, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.26556/jesp.v7i1.69.
[20]
R. Joyce, ‘Moral and Epistemic Normativity: The Guilty and the Innocent’. [Online]. Available: http://personal.victoria.ac.nz/richard_joyce/acrobat/joyce_2019_moral.and.epistemic.normativity.pdf
[21]
C. Cowie, ‘Good News for Moral Error Theorists: A Master Argument Against Companions in Guilt Strategies’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 115–130, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00048402.2015.1026269.
[22]
R. Das, ‘Bad News for Moral Error Theorists: There Is No Master Argument Against Companions in Guilt Strategies’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 58–69, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/00048402.2016.1178313.
[23]
P. Clipsham, ‘What’s Left for the Companions in Guilt Argument?’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 137–151, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10677-019-09981-x.
