Clipsham, Patrick. ‘What’s Left for the Companions in Guilt Argument?’ Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22, no. 1 (February 2019): 137–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-09981-x.
Cowie, Christopher. ‘Good News for Moral Error Theorists: A Master Argument Against Companions in Guilt Strategies’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94, no. 1 (2 January 2016): 115–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2015.1026269.
Cuneo, Terence. The Normative Web: An Argument for Moral Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Das, Ramon. ‘Bad News for Moral Error Theorists: There Is No Master Argument Against Companions in Guilt Strategies’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95, no. 1 (2 January 2017): 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2016.1178313.
———. ‘Evolutionary Debunking of Morality: Epistemological or Metaphysical?’ Philosophical Studies 173, no. 2 (February 2016): 417–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0499-9.
Elizabeth Tropman. ‘MAKING SENSE OF EXPLANATORY OBJECTIONS TO MORAL REALISM’. American Philosophical Quarterly 50, no. 1 (2013). https://www.jstor.org/stable/23460798?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
FitzPatrick, William. ‘Scientific Naturalism and the Explanation of Moral Beliefs: Challenging Evolutionary Debunking’, n.d. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118657775.ch27.
FitzPatrick, William J. ‘Debunking Evolutionary Debunking of Ethical Realism’. Philosophical Studies 172, no. 4 (April 2015): 883–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0295-y.
Hopster, Jeroen. ‘Evolutionary Arguments against Moral Realism: Why the Empirical Details Matter (and Which Ones Do)’. Biology & Philosophy 33, no. 5–6 (December 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9652-0.
Joyce, Richard. ‘Moral and Epistemic Normativity: The Guilty and the Innocent’, n.d. http://personal.victoria.ac.nz/richard_joyce/acrobat/joyce_2019_moral.and.epistemic.normativity.pdf.
Leibowitz, Uri D. ‘Scientific Explanation and Moral Explanation*’. Noûs, November 2010, no-no. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00775.x.
Leiter, Brian. ‘Moral Facts and Best Explanations’. In Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Majors, Brad. ‘Moral Explanation’. Philosophy Compass 2, no. 1 (January 2007): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00049.x.
MORTON, JUSTIN. ‘A New Evolutionary Debunking Argument Against Moral Realism’. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2, no. 2 (2016): 233–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2016.14.
Olson, Jonas. Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
———. ‘What Can Debunking Do for Us (Sceptics and Nihilists)?’ Ratio, 1 February 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12229.
Richard Joyce. The Evolution of Morality. MIT Press, 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=3338603&ppg=192.
Roberts, Debbie. ‘Explanatory Indispensability Arguments in Metaethics and Philosophy of Mathematics’, n.d. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198778592.001.0001/acprof-9780198778592-chapter-10?print=pdf.
Rowland, Richard. ‘Moral Error Theory and the Argument from Epistemic Reasons’. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7, no. 1 (5 June 2017): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v7i1.69.
Sinclair, Neil. ‘The Explanationist Argument For Moral Realism’, n.d. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1353/cjp.2011.0005?needAccess=true.
Street, Sharon. ‘A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value’. Philosophical Studies 127, no. 1 (January 2006): 109–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-1726-6.
Vavova, Katia. ‘Evolutionary Debunking of Moral Realism’. Philosophy Compass 10, no. 2 (February 2015): 104–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12194.
ZHONG, LEI. ‘A UNIFICATIONIST VINDICATION OF MORAL EXPLANATION’. The Philosophical Forum 42, no. 2 (June 2011): 131–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9191.2011.00383.x.
