[1]
Plato, The Meno. Infomotions, Inc., 2000. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=3314610&ppg=1#
[2]
J. Feinberg and R. Shafer-Landau, ‘Chisholm, “The Problem of the Criterion” (pages 168-173)’, in Reason and responsibility: readings in some basic problems of philosophy, Fifteenth edition., Boston, MA: Wadsworth, 2013.
[3]
D. Coady and Ebooks Corporation, ‘Chapter 1 of What to Believe Now (Introduction)’, in What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010
[4]
E. J. Olsson, ‘The Value of Knowledge’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 874–883, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00425.x.
[5]
S. C. Hetherington, ‘14. Externalism’, in Knowledge puzzles: an introduction to epistemology, Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1996.
[6]
S. C. Hetherington, ‘15. Internalism’, in Knowledge puzzles: an introduction to epistemology, Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1996.
[7]
D. Pritchard, ‘Epistemic Externalism and Internalism’, in Epistemology, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016, pp. 77–91. doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-52692-2_5.
[8]
Kihyeon Kim, ‘Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology’, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 4, 1993, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20014469?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[9]
Steven M. Cahn, Maureen Eckert, and Robert Buckley, ‘Edmund Gettier, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”, chapter of Knowledge and Reality (pages 5-7)’, in Knowledge and Reality, Prentice Hall.
[10]
L. Zagzebski, ‘The Inescapability of Gettier Problems’, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 174, Jan. 1994, doi: 10.2307/2220147.
[11]
‘Chapter 2: Brains in a Vat, Hilary Putnam’, in Skepticism, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
[12]
G. E. Moore, Philosophical papers. London: Allen & Unwin, 1959.
[13]
Susan Haack, ‘(Chapter 1) Foundationalism versus Coherentism: a Dichotomy  Disclaimed’, in Evidence and inquiry: towards reconstruction in epistemology, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993.
[14]
Peter D. Klein, ‘Human Knowledge and the Infinite Regress of                            Reasons’, Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 13, 1999, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2676107?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[15]
Susan Haack, ‘(Chapter 1) Foundationalism versus Coherentism: a Dichotomy  Disclaimed’, in Evidence and inquiry: towards reconstruction in epistemology, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993.
[16]
‘Naturalism in Epistemology’, [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-naturalized/
[17]
D. Coady and Ebooks Corporation, ‘Chapter 5 of What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues (Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorists)’, in What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010
[18]
‘Science and Pseudo-Science’, [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/
[19]
‘Scientific Method’, [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-method/
[20]
JUTTA. SCHICKORE and FRIEDRICH. STEINLE, Eds., ‘Chapter: Context of Discovery vs Context of Justification’, in Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction, vol. 14, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F1-4020-4251-5
[21]
J. Meheus and T. Nickles, ‘Deductive and ampliative adaptive logics as tools in the  study of creativity’, Foundations of Science, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 231–235, 1999, doi: 10.1023/A:1009663506333.
[22]
Herbert A. Simon, Patrick W. Langley and Gary L. Bradshaw, ‘Scientific Discovery as Problem Solving’, Synthese, vol. 47, no. 1, 1981, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20115615?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[23]
Robert Audi, ‘7 Testimony: The Social Foundation of Knowledge’, in Epistemology : A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge, Routledge, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=574520&ppg=36
[24]
D. Coady and Ebooks Corporation, ‘Chapter 2 of What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues (Experts and the Laity)’, in What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010
[25]
Stephen John, ‘EXPERT TESTIMONY AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL FREE-RIDING: THE MMR CONTROVERSY’, The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), vol. 61, no. 244, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23012979?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[26]
Fred Feldman, ‘13. Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement’, in Epistemology Futures, Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=422899&ppg=227
[27]
Adam Elga, ‘Reflection and Disagreement’, Noûs, vol. 41, no. 3, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4494542?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[28]
T. Dare, ‘Disagreement Over Vaccination Programmes: Deep Or Merely Complex and Why Does It Matter?’, HEC Forum, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 43–57, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10730-013-9227-z.
[29]
‘Can Wikipedia ever make the grade’, [Online]. Available: https://www.nku.edu/~ocallaghant/courses/601/wikipedia_art3.pdf
[30]
D. Coady and Ebooks Corporation, ‘Chapter of 6 What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues (The Blogosphere and the Conventional Media)’, in What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010