Adam Elga. ‘Reflection and Disagreement’. Noûs 41, no. 3 (2007). https://www.jstor.org/stable/4494542?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
‘Can Wikipedia Ever Make the Grade’, n.d. https://www.nku.edu/~ocallaghant/courses/601/wikipedia_art3.pdf.
‘Chapter 2: Brains in a Vat, Hilary Putnam’. In Skepticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Coady, David and Ebooks Corporation. ‘Chapter 1 of What to Believe Now (Introduction)’. In What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010.
———. ‘Chapter 2 of What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues (Experts and the Laity)’. In What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010.
———. ‘Chapter 5 of What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues (Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorists)’. In What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010.
———. ‘Chapter of 6 What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues (The Blogosphere and the Conventional Media)’. In What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010.
Dare, Tim. ‘Disagreement Over Vaccination Programmes: Deep Or Merely Complex and Why Does It Matter?’ HEC Forum 26, no. 1 (March 2014): 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-013-9227-z.
Feinberg, Joel, and Russ Shafer-Landau. ‘Chisholm, “The Problem of the Criterion” (Pages 168-173)’. In Reason and Responsibility: Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy, Fifteenth edition. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, 2013.
Fred Feldman. ‘13. Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement’. In Epistemology Futures. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=422899&ppg=227.
Herbert A. Simon, Patrick W. Langley and Gary L. Bradshaw. ‘Scientific Discovery as Problem Solving’. Synthese 47, no. 1 (1981). https://www.jstor.org/stable/20115615?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Hetherington, Stephen Cade. ‘14. Externalism’. In Knowledge Puzzles: An Introduction to Epistemology. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1996.
———. ‘15. Internalism’. In Knowledge Puzzles: An Introduction to Epistemology. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1996.
Kihyeon Kim. ‘Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology’. American Philosophical Quarterly 30, no. 4 (1993). https://www.jstor.org/stable/20014469?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Meheus, J., and Thomas Nickles. ‘Deductive and Ampliative Adaptive Logics as Tools in the Study of Creativity’. Foundations of Science 4, no. 3 (1999): 231–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009663506333.
Moore, G. E. Philosophical Papers. London: Allen & Unwin, 1959.
‘Naturalism in Epistemology’, n.d. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-naturalized/.
Olsson, Erik J. ‘The Value of Knowledge’. Philosophy Compass 6, no. 12 (December 2011): 874–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00425.x.
Peter D. Klein. ‘Human Knowledge and the Infinite Regress of Reasons’. Philosophical Perspectives 13 (1999). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2676107?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Plato. The Meno. Meno. Infomotions, Inc., 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=3314610&ppg=1#.
Pritchard, Duncan. ‘Epistemic Externalism and Internalism’. In Epistemology, 77–91. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52692-2_5.
Robert Audi. ‘7 Testimony: The Social Foundation of Knowledge’. In Epistemology : A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Routledge, 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=574520&ppg=36.
SCHICKORE, JUTTA., and FRIEDRICH. STEINLE, eds. ‘Chapter: Context of Discovery vs Context of Justification’. In Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction, Vol. 14. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2006. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F1-4020-4251-5.
‘Science and Pseudo-Science’, n.d. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/.
‘Scientific Method’, n.d. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-method/.
Stephen John. ‘EXPERT TESTIMONY AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL FREE-RIDING: THE MMR CONTROVERSY’. The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-) 61, no. 244 (2011). https://www.jstor.org/stable/23012979?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Steven M. Cahn, Maureen Eckert, and Robert Buckley. ‘Edmund Gettier, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”, Chapter of Knowledge and Reality (Pages 5-7)’. In Knowledge and Reality. Prentice Hall, n.d.
Susan Haack. ‘(Chapter 1) Foundationalism versus Coherentism: A Dichotomy Disclaimed’. In Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993.
———. ‘(Chapter 1) Foundationalism versus Coherentism: A Dichotomy Disclaimed’. In Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993.
Zagzebski, Linda. ‘The Inescapability of Gettier Problems’. The Philosophical Quarterly 44, no. 174 (January 1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/2220147.
