[1]
‘Does the new definition of science measure up? | Science | The Guardian’. https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2009/mar/03/science-definition-council-francis-bacon
[2]
‘Science Media Centre » How Science Works – the Peer Review process’. http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/how-science-works-the-peer-review-process/
[3]
‘Science is not what you want it to be - Making Science Public’. http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/makingsciencepublic/2014/05/25/science-is-not-what-you-want-it-to-be/
[4]
‘The magic of science - Making Science Public’. http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/makingsciencepublic/2012/03/23/the-magic-of-science/
[5]
‘Bad Science | Jacobin’. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/06/bad-science/
[6]
‘The cult of science | New Humanist’. https://newhumanist.org.uk/articles/2836/the-cult-of-science
[7]
D. Hikuroa, ‘Mātauranga Māori—the ūkaipō of knowledge in New Zealand’, Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 5–10, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/03036758.2016.1252407.
[8]
Kapua, T, ‘Defining Maori Science’, Historical Review: Bay of Plenty Journal of History, vol. 45, no. 2.
[9]
‘National Statement of Science Investment’. [Online]. Available: https://www.mbie.govt.nz/assets/2eaba48268/national-statement-science-investment-2015-2025.pdf
[10]
‘Hitching a ride - Griffith Review’. https://griffithreview.com/articles/hitching-a-ride/
[11]
‘The effects of plastic microbeads in facial scrubs - The Listener’. http://www.noted.co.nz/currently/science/the-effects-of-plastic-microbeads-in-facial-scrubs/
[12]
‘Long-term hazards of Taupo’s supervolcanoes - The Listener’. http://www.noted.co.nz/currently/science/long-term-hazards-of-taupos-supervolcanoes/
[13]
‘Trappings of success - The Listener’. http://www.noted.co.nz/currently/science/trappings-of-success/
[14]
‘Ghosts of the planet’s past - The Listener’. http://www.noted.co.nz/archive/listener-nz-2015/ghosts-of-the-planet-s-past/
[15]
‘Good to glow - The Listener’. http://www.noted.co.nz/archive/listener-nz-2015/good-to-glow/
[16]
‘Thaw point - The Listener’. http://www.noted.co.nz/archive/listener-nz-2015/thaw-point/
[17]
‘Sciblogs | Home - Sciblogs’. http://sciblogs.co.nz/
[18]
‘Scientific American Blog Network - Scientific American Blog Network’. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/
[19]
‘Discover Magazine Blogs - : Discover Magazine Blogs’. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/
[20]
‘Sailing, tsunami and climate change: Rhian Salmon at TEDxHomeBushRdWomen’. 2AD. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsINPfOwKmw
[21]
‘Home - Radiolab’. http://www.radiolab.org/
[22]
‘Radio New Zealand : National : Programmes : Our Changing World’. http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ourchangingworld
[23]
‘Scientists Are Hoarding Data And It’s Ruining Medical Research - BuzzFeed News’. https://www.buzzfeed.com/bengoldacre/deworming-trials?utm_term=.ks372b8yN#.dsGlg0rRQ
[24]
‘NZ Icefest - Christchurch 2016 | NZ IceFest’. http://nzicefest.co.nz/
[25]
‘Breaking Ice Arts-Science Symposium | NZ IceFest’. http://nzicefest.co.nz/breaking-ice-arts-science-symposium
[26]
‘2009 Expedition - Cape Farewell - The cultural response to climate change’. http://www.capefarewell.com/2009.html
[27]
‘Poison in the Night | Speakeasy Science’. http://blogs.plos.org/speakeasyscience/2010/09/07/poison-in-the-night/
[28]
‘Nano Girl vs. Rhys Darby the nanobot zombie brain debate - YouTube’. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22aaqMjkXho
[29]
‘Where Do Trees Get Their Mass From? - YouTube’. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KZb2_vcNTg
[30]
‘Adam Curtis, All watched over by machines of loving grace, episode 2: The use and abuse of vegetational concepts’. http://www.etv.org.nz/programme.php?id=40359
[31]
‘Climate Change Debate: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) - YouTube’. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjuGCJJUGsg
[32]
Jair Salinas, ‘Acapella Science - Evo Devo (Despacito parody) subtitulada al español - YouTube’. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2LRSBVRPR0
[33]
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell, ‘What if there was a black hole in your pocket? - YouTube’. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nHBGFKLHZQ
[34]
‘Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, ed. Bucchi and Trench’. [Online]. Available: https://moodle.ufsc.br/pluginfile.php/1485212/mod_resource/content/1/Handbook-of-Public-Communication-of-Science-and-Technology.pdf
[35]
‘A Short History of Science Communication - An Infographic — FromTheLabBench’. http://www.fromthelabbench.com/from-the-lab-bench-science-blog/2016/6/21/a-short-history-of-science-communication-an-infographic
[36]
‘The debunking handbook, John Cook and Stephan Lewandowsky’. [Online]. Available: https://www.skepticalscience.com/docs/Debunking_Handbook.pdf
[37]
R. A. J. Pielke, The Honest Broker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511818110.
[38]
‘Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds - The New Yorker’. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/27/why-facts-dont-change-our-minds
[39]
‘Tali Sharot: The optimism bias | TED Talk | TED.com’. https://www.ted.com/talks/tali_sharot_the_optimism_bias
[40]
Ebooks Corporation, Communication and engagement with science and technology: issues and dilemmas : a reader in science communication. New York: Routledge, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=1092837
[41]
Communicating Science in Social Contexts. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-1-4020-8598-7
[42]
K. MOON and D. BLACKMAN, ‘A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists’, Conservation Biology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1167–1177, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1111/cobi.12326.
[43]
D. M. Kahan et al., ‘The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks’, Nature Climate Change, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 732–735, May 2012, doi: 10.1038/nclimate1547.
[44]
R. Grundmann and J.-P. Cavaillé, ‘Simplicity In Science And Its Publics’, Science as Culture, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 353–389, Sep. 2000, doi: 10.1080/713695251.
[45]
‘Biotech remains unloved by the more informed’. [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v416/n6878/pdf/416261a.pdf
[46]
‘Report of National Science Challenges panel’. [Online]. Available: http://www.pmcsa.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/Report-of-National-Science-Challenges.pdf
[47]
‘Shitty First Draft’, [Online]. Available: https://wrd.as.uky.edu/sites/default/files/1-Shitty%20First%20Drafts.pdf
[48]
‘Thaw point - The Listener’. http://www.noted.co.nz/archive/listener-nz-2015/thaw-point/
[49]
‘BBC Blogs - Adam Curtis - THE VEGETABLES OF TRUTH’. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/entries/a2094c9d-9864-348e-a241-7aa93adf0c09
[50]
‘Why being bilingual works wonders for your brain | Science | The Guardian’. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/aug/07/being-bilingual-good-for-brain-mental-health
[51]
D. Blum, M. Knudson, R. M. Henig, and ebrary, Inc, A field guide for science writers, 2nd ed. Oxford [England]: Oxford University Press, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/vuw/Top?id=10271560
[52]
L. Gutkind and H. F. Buck, Eds., Keep it real: everything you need to know about researching and writing creative nonfiction. New York, N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Co, 2009.
[53]
‘Writing Resources « Rebecca Skloot’. http://rebeccaskloot.com/writing/writing-resources/
[54]
‘Anatomy of a masterpiece: 13 reasons why the “funniest video of the year” is pure comedy gold’. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the-filter/anatomy-masterpiece-13-reasons-funniest-video-year-pure-comedy/
[55]
‘Measure Text Readability - Readability and Keyword Density Analysis and Tools - Unique readability tools to improve your writing! Readable.io’. https://readable.io/
[56]
‘Five Ways to Improve your Science Writing – Entomology Today’. https://entomologytoday.org/2014/11/25/5-ways-to-improve-your-science-writing/
[57]
‘Science writing checklist’. [Online]. Available: https://entomologytoday.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/writingchecklist2014.pdf
[58]
‘Deconstructing Gawande – why narrative and structure are important - Not Exactly Rocket Science : Not Exactly Rocket Science’. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/08/23/deconstructing-gawande-why-narrative-and-structure-are-important/#.WMXoGRhh1Bw
[59]
‘How to avoid common mistakes in science writing | Science | The Guardian’. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/apr/24/how-to-avoid-common-mistakes-in-science-writing
[60]
‘How to write a science news story | Wellcome Trust Science Writing Prize | Ian Sample | Science | The Guardian’. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/mar/28/news-story-research-paper-wellcome-trust-science-writing-prize
[61]
‘Deborah Blum on science writing: I’m a neurotic over-researcher | Science | The Guardian’. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/apr/24/deborah-blum-science-writing
[62]
‘David Dobbs on science writing: “hunt down jargon and kill it” | Science | The Guardian’. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/apr/19/science-writing-david-dobbs
[63]
‘Secrets of good science writing | Science | The Guardian’. https://www.theguardian.com/science/series/secrets-science-writing
[64]
‘In Defense Of Metaphors In Science Writing - Scientific American Blog Network’. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/life-unbounded/in-defense-of-metaphors-in-science-writing/
[65]
‘The use of metaphors in science and technology – the teaching tomtom’. https://teachingtomtom.com/2012/11/29/the-use-of-metaphors-in-science-and-technology/
[66]
P. Ball, ‘A metaphor too far’, Nature, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1038/news.2011.115.
[67]
‘Your Penis Is Getting in the Way of My Science’. http://io9.gizmodo.com/your-penis-is-getting-in-the-way-of-my-science-1564473352
[68]
‘A Guide for Scientists on Giving Comments to Journalists – Phenomena’. http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/22/a-guide-for-scientists-on-giving-comments-to-journalists/
[69]
‘Forewarned is forearmed - Science Media Savvy | Helping scientists work effectively with the news media’. http://sciencemediasavvy.org/dealing-with-the-media/
[70]
‘MIT App Inventor | Explore MIT App Inventor’. http://appinventor.mit.edu/explore/
[71]
‘Infographics & Creative Commons | Trello’. https://trello.com/b/TG8zZe0C/infographics-creative-commons
[72]
‘Infographics and Creative Commons’. https://www.haikudeck.com/infographics--creative-commons-business-presentation-1c5RAMQOgB
[73]
‘Creative Commons Kiwi - YouTube’. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeTlXtEOplA
[74]
‘Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand’. https://creativecommons.org.nz/
[75]
‘Creative Commons Pukeko on Vimeo’. [Online]. Available: https://vimeo.com/147551334
[76]
R. Priestley, ‘A Survey of the History of Science in New Zealand 1769-1992’, History Compass, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 474–490, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1478-0542.2010.00684.x.
[77]
J. Fleming and J. Star, ‘The emergence of science communication in Aotearoa New Zealand’. [Online]. Available: https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/JCOM_1603_2017_A02.pdf
[78]
‘PM’s new, protein-wrangling science advisor’. https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2018/06/12/117856/new-protein-wrangling-pms-science-adviser-greeted-with-delight#
[79]
‘Professor Juliet Gerrard, The Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor’. https://www.pmcsa.ac.nz/our-community/professor-juliet-gerrard/
[80]
‘NZ Herald’, [Online]. Available: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12138857
[81]
‘Writing for Impact: what you need to know, and 5 ways to know it | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy’. https://paulcairney.wordpress.com/2017/05/24/writing-for-impact-what-you-need-to-know-and-5-ways-to-know-it/
[82]
D. Blum, M. Knudson, R. M. Henig, and ebrary, Inc, A field guide for science writers, 2nd ed. Oxford [England]: Oxford University Press, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/vuw/Top?id=10271560
[83]
Ebooks Corporation, Communication and engagement with science and technology: issues and dilemmas : a reader in science communication. New York: Routledge, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=1092837
[84]
R. Hayes, D. Grossman, and Union of Concerned Scientists, A scientist’s guide to talking with the media: practical advice from the Union of Concerned Scientists. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2006.
[85]
Martin Robbins, ‘This is a news website article about a scientific paper’, Guardian, Sep. 2010, [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist/2010/sep/24/1
[86]
‘Media Relations - Jane Johnston - 9781742376448 - Allen & Unwin - Australia’, [Online]. Available: https://www.allenandunwin.com/browse/books/academic-professional/media-communication-studies/Media-Relations-Jane-Johnston-9781742376448
[87]
A. Dudo, ‘Scientists, the Media, and the Public Communication of Science’, Sociology Compass, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 761–775, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1111/soc4.12298.
[88]
Ebooks Corporation, Communication and engagement with science and technology: issues and dilemmas : a reader in science communication. New York: Routledge, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=1092837
[89]
‘Louisiana Bucket Brigade | Clean air, Sustainability, Justice’. http://labucketbrigade.org/
[90]
‘Patients Who Were Research Subjects and the Doctors Who Listened - the Citizen Science of HIV/AIDS Research - Citizen Science Salon : Citizen Science Salon’. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/citizen-science-salon/2014/07/21/hivaids-citizen-science/#.XNs_4y-B1hE
[91]
Bell , David Bell, David, Science, Technology and Culture. McGraw-Hill Education, 2007. [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/VUW/detail.action?docID=287869
[92]
R. Barthes and A. Lavers, Mythologies. London: Vintage, 1993.
[93]
Emily D. Edwards, ‘Firewalking: A Contemporary Ritual and Transformation’, TDR (1988-), vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 98–114, 1998, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1146701?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[94]
S. Woolgar, Science, the very idea, vol. Key ideas. Chichester [West Sussex]: Ellis Horwood, 1988.
[95]
S. G. Harding, Is science multicultural?: postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies, vol. Race, gender, and science. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press, 1998.
[96]
K. Higgins, ‘Post-truth: a guide for the perplexed’, Nature, vol. 540, no. 7631, pp. 9–9, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1038/540009a.
[97]
‘Peak Bullshit? | Post-truth | An essay by Richard King’. https://sydneyreviewofbooks.com/peak-bullshit-post-truth/
[98]
‘Scientific advice in a troubled world | Office of the Prime Minister’s Science Advisory Committee, New Zealand’. http://www.pmcsa.org.nz/blog/scientific-advice-in-a-troubled-world/
[99]
‘Inclusion-Exclusion In Mathematics And Beyond’. http://digitaleditions.walsworthprintgroup.com/publication/?i=566588&article_id=3302575&view=articleBrowser&ver=html5#{"issue_id":566588,"view":"articleBrowser","article_id":"3302575"}
[100]
P. Harris et. al., ‘A Review of Māori Astronomy’. [Online]. Available: http://www.narit.or.th/en/files/2013JAHHvol16/2013JAHH...16..325H.pdf
[101]
Ebooks Corporation, Communication and engagement with science and technology: issues and dilemmas : a reader in science communication. New York: Routledge, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=1092837
[102]
Jean RobertsonCraig McDaniel, ‘Science and contemporary art’, Grove Art Online, [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T2088866
