Bibliography for Laws 392 - Special Topic: Comparative Corporate Governance BETA

[1]

F. H. Easterbrook and D. R. Fischel, The economic structure of corporate law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1991.

[2]

Salomon v Salomon [1897] AC 22 (HL). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/Blob/I66D001C0107C11DDBD0D9841A0D10357.pdf?targetType=inline&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentImage&uniqueId=9f2056cf-bd26-4134-a23c-aeea242f4228&contextData=(sc.Search)

[3]

R. H. Kraakman, The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

[4]

R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer, ‘The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 46, 2008, [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eoh&AN=0982975&site=ehost-live

[5]

B. R. Cheffins, Company law: theory, structure, and operation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996, pp. 31-46-126–162.

[6]

J. E. Parkinson, Corporate Power and ResponsibilityIssues in the Theory of Company Law. Oxford University Press, 1995, p. Ch 1 part III-Ch 6 part III. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198259893.001.0001.

[7]

Lucian Arye Bebchuk, ‘The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power’, Harvard Law Review, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 833–914, 2005, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093350?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[8]

W. Bratton and M. L. Wachter, ‘The case against shareholder empowerment’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 158, 2010, [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=49222725&site=ehost-live

[9]

Regentcrest Plc (In Liquidation) v Cohen [2001] BCC 494 (Ch D). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=g&serNum=2000454391&pubNum=4662&originatingDoc=I854223E0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&refType=UD&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=(sc.DocLink)

[10]

Hogg v Cramphorn [1967] Ch 254. [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/Blob/I9B77A1F0111F11DD9603E7F6FBD67DC6.pdf?targetType=inline&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentImage&uniqueId=58ec4417-6ccf-401d-ab2a-d36d2784dce0&contextData=(sc.DocLink)

[11]

Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum [1974] AC 82 (HL). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/Blob/I46DCD980111F11DD9603E7F6FBD67DC6.pdf?targetType=inline&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentImage&uniqueId=1493dd97-3a4f-409b-9d5f-00eb17626114&contextData=(sc.Search)

[12]

Companies Act 2006 (UK) ss 170-173. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/pdfs/ukpga_20060046_en.pdf

[13]

D’Jan of London Ltd [1993] BCC 646, [1994] 1 BCLC 561 (Chancery D, Companies Court). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=g&serNum=1993252235&pubNum=4662&originatingDoc=I58D7B730E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&refType=UD&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=(sc.DocLink)

[14]

Re Barings plc (No. 5) [1999] 1 BCLC 433 (Sections III A and B only). [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/ap/auth/default.asp?customer=vuw

[15]

Companies Act 2006 (UK), ss 174, 232, 1157. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/pdfs/ukpga_20060046_en.pdf

[16]

Insolvency Act 1986, s 214. Statute Law Database. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45/section/214

[17]

Shlensky v.Wrigley 237 N.E.2d 776 (Ill. App. 1968. [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=Y&serNum=1968121519&pubNum=578&originatingDoc=Ib1d7b536946211d9bc61beebb95be672&refType=RP&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=(sc.Search)

[18]

Smith v Van Gorkom 488 A 2d 858 (Del 1985). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=Y&serNum=1985114193&pubNum=162&originatingDoc=I0cdc97491f3011e19553c1f5e5d07b6a&refType=RP&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=(sc.Search)#co_pp_sp_162_872

[19]

In re Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation 907 A 2d 693 (Del Ch 2005). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Document/I9e05c5be181111da974abd26ac2a6030/View/FullText.html?navigationPath=Search%2Fv3%2Fsearch%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad6040700000157df83bd0c4b1b8d3a%3FNav%3DALL%26fragmentIdentifier%3DI9e05c5be181111da974abd26ac2a6030%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Search%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSource=Search&listPageSource=2590b56018b8eb5e024ff647e181b5c5&list=ALL&rank=0&grading=na&sessionScopeId=3b0bfad76204e0855aaab7f4bfadc18af1539a7e895c95783b5912d9f548cc50&originationContext=Smart%20Answer&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=%28sc.Search%29

[20]

New York Business Corporation Law, s 717(b). [Online]. Available: http://codes.findlaw.com/ny/business-corporation-law/bsc-sect-717.html

[21]

Delaware General Corporation Law, s 102(b)(7). [Online]. Available: http://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc01/index.shtml

[22]

Aberdeen Railway v Blaikie (1854) Macq HL 461. [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/Blob/ID0B17E1087AA11E3B34FB08E04011155.pdf?targetType=inline&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentImage&uniqueId=8841d1cf-d3aa-4094-bf9b-27dcda34c47b&contextData=(sc.Search)

[23]

Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 (HL). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/Blob/I6D067120111F11DD9603E7F6FBD67DC6.pdf?targetType=inline&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentImage&uniqueId=cfa25fc8-3926-4759-8224-92f78ba661a1&contextData=(sc.Search)

[24]

Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134 (HL). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/Blob/I2EDB1BC0112011DD9603E7F6FBD67DC6.pdf?targetType=inline&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentImage&uniqueId=d8d81219-4e8a-446a-b6ef-be4d515cfadb&contextData=(sc.DocLink)

[25]

Companies Act 2006 (UK) ss 170, 175, 177-180, 182-185 and 190. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/pdfs/ukpga_20060046_en.pdf

[26]

Guth v Loft Inc 23 Del.Ch. 255, 5 A 2d 503 (Del. 1939). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Document/I5367f796339011d986b0aa9c82c164c0/View/FullText.html?originationContext=typeAhead&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)

[27]

Broz and RFB Cellular Inc v Cellular Information Systems 673 A 2d 148 (Del. 1996). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=Y&serNum=1996076865&pubNum=162&originatingDoc=I17f0d4cbcbe311e3b86bd602cb8781fa&refType=RP&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=(sc.Search)#co_pp_sp_162_154

[28]

D. Kershaw, ‘Lost in Translation: Corporate Opportunities in Comparative Perspective.’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 25, 2005, [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=19525093&site=ehost-live

[29]

Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 462. [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/Blob/IAC366320B75A11E0819399D83AE121DE.pdf?targetType=inline&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentImage&uniqueId=dbd66c6e-be8c-43c0-bc82-4fac890d4f9e&contextData=(sc.DocLink)

[30]

‘Edwards v Halliwell [1950] 2 All ER 1064 (CA)’.

[31]

Zapata v Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779 (Del. 1981). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=Y&serNum=1981126670&pubNum=162&originatingDoc=I6ed3805d92de11d993e6d35cc61aab4a&refType=RP&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=(sc.Search)

[32]

Aronson v Lewis, 473 A.2d 805 (Del. 1984). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=Y&serNum=1984120300&pubNum=162&originatingDoc=I32dec634557711d997e0acd5cbb90d3f&refType=RP&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=(sc.Search)#co_pp_sp_162_809

[33]

Companies Act 2006 (UK) ss 232-234, 239, 260-264. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/pdfs/ukpga_20060046_en.pdf

[34]

PART 19 - PARTIES AND GROUP LITIGATION - Civil Procedure Rules, r 19.1. [Online]. Available: https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part19#19.9

[35]

Delaware General Corporation Law, s 141(a). [Online]. Available: http://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc04/index.shtml

[36]

Ronald J. Gilson, ‘Controlling Shareholders and Corporate Governance: Complicating the Comparative Taxonomy’, Harvard Law Review, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 1641–1679, 2006, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093529?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[37]

O’Neill v Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092 (HL). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/Blob/IEF5F8150122011DDB3CBE2AC6B57B4D3.pdf?targetType=inline&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentImage&uniqueId=0c5663c2-5a1f-4f31-a7f7-874eb48a9611&contextData=(sc.Search)

[38]

Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1971] AC 360 (HL). [Online]. Available: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/Blob/I253C7E10112011DD9603E7F6FBD67DC6.pdf?targetType=inline&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentImage&uniqueId=7cece270-d351-4544-93f1-97b6982fb90d&contextData=(sc.Search)

[39]

Companies Act 2006 (UK) ss 994-996. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/pdfs/ukpga_20060046_en.pdf

[40]

Insolvency Act 1986, s 122(g). Statute Law Database. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45/section/122

[41]

R. J. Gilson and R. H. Kraakman, ‘The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency’, Virginia Law Review, vol. 70, no. 4, May 1984, doi: 10.2307/1073080.

[42]

J. C. Coffee, ‘Regulating the Market for Corporate Control: A Critical Assessment of the Tender Offer’s Role in Corporate Governance’, Columbia Law Review, vol. 84, no. 5, Jun. 1984, doi: 10.2307/1122351.

[43]

E. Schuster, ‘The Mandatory Bid Rule: Efficient, After All?’, Modern Law Review, vol. 76, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a2h&AN=87371919&site=ehost-live

[44]

C. Gerner-Beuerle, D. Kershaw, and M. A. Solinas, ‘Is the Board Neutrality Rule Trivial? Amnesia About Corporate Law in European Takeover Regulation’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1799291.

[45]

Takeover Panel City Code on Takeovers and Mergers, general principle 3 and rules 9 and 21. [Online]. Available: http://www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/code.pdf

[46]

Companies Act 2006 (UK) ss 168, 303-304 and part 28. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/pdfs/ukpga_20060046_en.pdf

[47]

DIRECTIVE 2004/25/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 21 April 2004 on Takeover Bids, articles 5 and 9. [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004L0025&from=EN

[48]

B. Cheffins and R. Thomas, ‘Should shareholders have a greater say over executive pay? Learning from the U.S. Experience’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 2001, [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14735970.2001.11419863?needAccess=true

[49]

L. Bebchuk and J. Fried, ‘Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, 2003, [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eoh&AN=0671591&site=ehost-live

[50]

L. Bebchuk, J. Fried, and D. Walker, ‘“Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation”’, U Chicago L R, vol. 69, pp. 751–793, 2002, [Online]. Available: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5183&context=uclrev

[51]

Companies Act 2006 (UK) ss 188, 215, 217, 412, 420-422 and 439-440. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/pdfs/ukpga_20060046_en.pdf