Bebchuk, L and J Fried, ‘Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem’ (2003) 3 Journal of Economic Perspectives <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eoh&AN=0671591&site=ehost-live>
Bebchuk, L, J Fried and D Walker, ‘“Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation”’ (2002) 69 U Chicago L R 751 <http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5183&context=uclrev>
Bratton, WW and ML Wachter, ‘The Case against Shareholder Empowerment’ (2010) 158 University of Pennsylvania Law Review <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=49222725&site=ehost-live>
Cheffins, B and R Thomas, ‘Should Shareholders Have a Greater Say over Executive Pay? Learning from the U.S. Experience’ [2001] Journal of Corporate Law Studies <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14735970.2001.11419863?needAccess=true>
Cheffins, Brian R, Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation (Clarendon Press, 1996) 31
Coffee, John C, ‘Regulating the Market for Corporate Control: A Critical Assessment of the Tender Offer’s Role in Corporate Governance’ (1984) 84(5) Columbia Law Review
Easterbrook, Frank H and Daniel R Fischel, The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Harvard University Press, 1991)
‘Edwards v Halliwell [1950] 2 All ER 1064 (CA)’
Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten, David Kershaw and Matteo Alfredo Solinas, ‘Is the Board Neutrality Rule Trivial? Amnesia About Corporate Law in European Takeover Regulation’ [2011] SSRN Electronic Journal
Gilson, Ronald J and Reinier H Kraakman, ‘The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency’ (1984) 70(4) Virginia Law Review
Kershaw, D, ‘Lost in Translation: Corporate Opportunities in Comparative Perspective.’ (2005) 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=19525093&site=ehost-live>
Kraakman, Reinier H, The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed, 2009)
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes and Andrei Shleifer, ‘The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins’ (2008) 46 Journal of Economic Literature <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eoh&AN=0982975&site=ehost-live>
Lucian Arye Bebchuk, ‘The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power’ (2005) 118(3) Harvard Law Review 833 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093350?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Parkinson, JE, Corporate Power and ResponsibilityIssues in the Theory of Company Law (Oxford University Press, 1995) Ch 1 part III-Ch 6 part III <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198259893.001.0001/acprof-9780198259893>
Ronald J. Gilson, ‘Controlling Shareholders and Corporate Governance: Complicating the Comparative Taxonomy’ (2006) 119(6) Harvard Law Review 1641 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4093529?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Schuster, E, ‘The Mandatory Bid Rule: Efficient, After All?’ (2013) 76 Modern Law Review <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a2h&AN=87371919&site=ehost-live>
Aberdeen Railway v Blaikie (1854) Macq HL 461
Aronson v Lewis, 473 A2d 805 (Del 1984)
Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 (HL)
Broz and RFB Cellular Inc v Cellular Information Systems 673 A 2d 148 (Del 1996)
D’Jan of London Ltd [1993] BCC 646, [1994] 1 BCLC 561 (Chancery D, Companies Court)
Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1971] AC 360 (HL)
Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 462
Guth v Loft Inc 23 DelCh 255, 5 A 2d 503 (Del 1939)
Hogg v Cramphorn [1967] Ch 254
Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum [1974] AC 82 (HL)
In re Walt Disney Co Derivative Litigation 907 A 2d 693 (Del Ch 2005)
O’Neill v Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092 (HL)
Re Barings plc (No 5) [1999] 1 BCLC 433 (Sections III A and B only)
Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134 (HL)
Regentcrest Plc (In Liquidation) v Cohen [2001] BCC 494 (Ch D)
Salomon v Salomon [1897] AC 22 (HL)
Shlensky vWrigley 237 NE2d 776 (Ill App 1968
Smith v Van Gorkom 488 A 2d 858 (Del 1985)
Takeover Panel City Code on Takeovers and Mergers, general principle 3 and rules 9 and 21
Zapata v Maldonado, 430 A2d 779 (Del 1981)
Companies Act 2006 (UK) Ss 168, 303-304 and Part 28
Companies Act 2006 (UK) Ss 170, 175, 177-180, 182-185 and 190
Companies Act 2006 (UK) Ss 170-173
Companies Act 2006 (UK), Ss 174, 232, 1157
Companies Act 2006 (UK) Ss 188, 215, 217, 412, 420-422 and 439-440
Companies Act 2006 (UK) Ss 232-234, 239, 260-264
Companies Act 2006 (UK) Ss 994-996
Delaware General Corporation Law, s 102(b)(7)
Delaware General Corporation Law, s 141(a)
DIRECTIVE 2004/25/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 21 April 2004 on Takeover Bids, Articles 5 and 9 (Official Journal of the European Union)
Insolvency Act 1986, s 122(g)
Insolvency Act 1986, s 214
New York Business Corporation Law, s 717(b)
PART 19 - PARTIES AND GROUP LITIGATION - Civil Procedure Rules, r 19.1