Adam Elga (2007) ‘Reflection and Disagreement’, Noûs, 41(3). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4494542?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
‘Can Wikipedia ever make the grade’ (no date). Available at: https://www.nku.edu/~ocallaghant/courses/601/wikipedia_art3.pdf.
‘Chapter 2: Brains in a Vat, Hilary Putnam’ (1999) in Skepticism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Coady, D. and Ebooks Corporation (2012a) ‘Chapter 1 of What to Believe Now (Introduction)’, in What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010.
Coady, D. and Ebooks Corporation (2012b) ‘Chapter 2 of What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues (Experts and the Laity)’, in What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010.
Coady, D. and Ebooks Corporation (2012c) ‘Chapter 5 of What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues (Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorists)’, in What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010.
Coady, D. and Ebooks Corporation (2012d) ‘Chapter of 6 What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues (The Blogosphere and the Conventional Media)’, in What to believe now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=844010.
Dare, T. (2014) ‘Disagreement Over Vaccination Programmes: Deep Or Merely Complex and Why Does It Matter?’, HEC Forum, 26(1), pp. 43–57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-013-9227-z.
Feinberg, J. and Shafer-Landau, R. (2013) ‘Chisholm, “The Problem of the Criterion” (pages 168-173)’, in Reason and responsibility: readings in some basic problems of philosophy. Fifteenth edition. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
Fred Feldman (2006) ‘13. Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement’, in Epistemology Futures. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=422899&ppg=227.
Herbert A. Simon, Patrick W. Langley and Gary L. Bradshaw (1981) ‘Scientific Discovery as Problem Solving’, Synthese, 47(1). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20115615?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Hetherington, S.C. (1996a) ‘14. Externalism’, in Knowledge puzzles: an introduction to epistemology. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Hetherington, S.C. (1996b) ‘15. Internalism’, in Knowledge puzzles: an introduction to epistemology. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Kihyeon Kim (1993) ‘Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 30(4). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20014469?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Meheus, J. and Nickles, T. (1999) ‘Deductive and ampliative adaptive logics as tools in the  study of creativity’, Foundations of Science, 4(3), pp. 231–235. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009663506333.
Moore, G.E. (1959) Philosophical papers. London: Allen & Unwin.
‘Naturalism in Epistemology’ (no date). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-naturalized/.
Olsson, E.J. (2011) ‘The Value of Knowledge’, Philosophy Compass, 6(12), pp. 874–883. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00425.x.
Peter D. Klein (1999) ‘Human Knowledge and the Infinite Regress of                            Reasons’, Philosophical Perspectives, 13. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2676107?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Plato (2000) The Meno, Meno. Infomotions, Inc. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=3314610&ppg=1#.
Pritchard, D. (2016) ‘Epistemic Externalism and Internalism’, in Epistemology. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 77–91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52692-2_5.
Robert Audi (2010) ‘7 Testimony: The Social Foundation of Knowledge’, in Epistemology : A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Routledge. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=574520&ppg=36.
SCHICKORE, JUTTA. and STEINLE, FRIEDRICH. (eds) (2006) ‘Chapter: Context of Discovery vs Context of Justification’, in Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F1-4020-4251-5.
‘Science and Pseudo-Science’ (no date). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/.
‘Scientific Method’ (no date). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-method/.
Stephen John (2011) ‘EXPERT TESTIMONY AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL FREE-RIDING: THE MMR CONTROVERSY’, The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 61(244). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23012979?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Steven M. Cahn, Maureen Eckert, and Robert Buckley (no date) ‘Edmund Gettier, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”, chapter of Knowledge and Reality (pages 5-7)’, in Knowledge and Reality. Prentice Hall.
Susan Haack (1993a) ‘(Chapter 1) Foundationalism versus Coherentism: a Dichotomy  Disclaimed’, in Evidence and inquiry: towards reconstruction in epistemology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Susan Haack (1993b) ‘(Chapter 1) Foundationalism versus Coherentism: a Dichotomy  Disclaimed’, in Evidence and inquiry: towards reconstruction in epistemology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Zagzebski, L. (1994) ‘The Inescapability of Gettier Problems’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 44(174). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2220147.