[1]
P. Baehr, ‘Fascism, Ethnic Cleansing, and the “New Militarism”: Assessing the Recent Historical Sociology of Michael Mann’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 99–113, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/13698230601122503.
[2]
A. Bauerkamper, ‘A New Consensus? Recent Research on Fascism in Europe, 1918-1945*’, History Compass, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 536–566, May 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1478-0542.2006.00316.x.
[3]
J. Semelin, ‘Taking Mann Seriously?’, Political Studies Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 279–289, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.00110.x.
[4]
A. C. PINTO, ‘Back to European Fascism’, Contemporary European History, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 103–115, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1017/S0960777306003122.
[5]
D. Riley, ‘Enigmas of Fascism’, New Left Review, vol. 30, pp. 134–147, 2004, doi: 10.1086/.
[6]
M. Mann, ‘Chapter 1 - A sociology of fascist movements’, in Fascists, Cambridge University Press, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=266589&ppg=11
[7]
M. Mann and EBSCOhost, Fascists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=164301
[8]
E. Sayes, ‘Actor–Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency?’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 134–149, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0306312713511867.
[9]
B. Latour and Ebooks Corporation, Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=422646
[10]
Johnson, J., ‘Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer’, Social Problems,, [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/socprob35&id=312
[11]
J. C. Alexander, ‘On the Social Construction of Moral Universals: The `Holocaust’ from War Crime to Trauma Drama’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5–85, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1368431002005001001.
[12]
J. C. Alexander, ‘Culture trauma, morality and solidarity’, Thesis Eleven, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 3–16, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0725513615625239.
[13]
J. C. Alexander and Ebooks Corporation, Cultural trauma and collective identity. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=837285
[14]
R. Eyerman, ‘Harvey Milk and the Trauma of Assassination’, Cultural Sociology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 399–421, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1177/1749975512445429.
[15]
Turner, Victor, ‘Social Dramas and Stories about Them’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 7, no. 1, doi: 10.1023/.
[16]
Eyerman, Ron, The Cultural Sociology of Political Assassination : From MLK and RFK to Fortuyn and van Gogh. Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230337879  ISBN: 9780230118232  ISBN: 9780230118225.
[17]
SpringerLink (Online service), Strength and Weakness: The Authoritarian Personality Today. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1993. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9180-7
[18]
M. Roiser and C. Willig, ‘The hidden history of authoritarianism’, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 77–97, Nov. 1995, doi: 10.1177/095269519500800405.
[19]
C. Thorne, ‘Fulfilling the Fascist Lie’, South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 879–889, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1215/00382876-7165959.
[20]
M. Rosier and C. Willig, ‘The Strange Death of the Authoritarian Personality: 50 years of psychological and political debate’, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 71–96, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/952695102015004682
[21]
R. Connell, Masculinities, 2nd ed. Crows Nest, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin, 2005.
[22]
R. W. Connell and J. W. Messerschmidt, ‘Hegemonic Masculinity’, Gender & Society, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 829–859, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639.
[23]
R. Collins, Violence: a micro-sociological theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt4cg9d3
[24]
R. Collins, ‘,The micro-sociology of violence.’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 566–576, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01256.x
[25]
M. Cooney, ‘The scientific significance of Collins’s Violence’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 586–594, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01258.x.
[26]
R. B. Felson, ‘Is violence natural, unnatural, or rational?’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 577–585, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01257.x
[27]
E. Laurier, ‘The Graphic Transcript: Poaching Comic Book Grammar for Inscribing the Visual, Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Action’, Geography Compass, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 235–248, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1111/gec3.12123.
[28]
B. Schwartz and H. Schuman, ‘History, Commemoration, and Belief: Abraham Lincoln in American Memory, 1945-2001’, American Sociological Review, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 183–203, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1177/000312240507000201.
[29]
B. Schwartz, ‘Collective Memory and History: How Abraham Lincoln Became a Symbol of Racial Equality’, The Sociological Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 469–496, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1997.tb00488.x.
[30]
Barry Schwartz, ‘Lincoln at the Millennium’, Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association, vol. 24, no. 1, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20149037?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[31]
Coser, L, ‘Presidential Address: Two Methods in Search of a Substance’, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 691–700, doi: 1469-493.
[32]
M. Lynch, ‘Revisiting the Cultural Dope’, Human Studies, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 223–233, May 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10746-012-9227-z.
[33]
J. Heritage, ‘The morality of cognition’, in Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Polity Press, 1985. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=1295011&ppg=85
[34]
W. Sharrock, ‘Ethnomethodology’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 40, no. 4, Dec. 1989, doi: 10.2307/590893.
[35]
L. Wacquant, ‘Scrutinizing the Street: Poverty, Morality, and the Pitfalls of Urban Ethnography                              . By Mitchell  Duneier. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1999. Pp. 383. $27.00 (cloth); $15.00 (paper).                              . By Elijah  Anderson. New York: W. W. Norton, 1999. Pp. 352. $14.95 (paper).                              . By Katherine  Newman. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Knopf, 1999. Pp. 401. $15.00 (paper).’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 1468–1532, May 2002, doi: 10.1086/340461.
[36]
M. Duneier, ‘What Kind of Combat Sport Is Sociology?’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 1551–1576, May 2002, doi: 10.1086/342925.
[37]
M. Duneier and H. Molotch, ‘Talking City Trouble: Interactional Vandalism, Social Inequality, and the "Urban Interaction Problem”’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 1263–1295, Mar. 1999, doi: 10.1086/210175.
[38]
R. Randell, ‘No paradigm to mobilize: the new mobilities paradigm is not a paradigm’, Applied Mobilities, pp. 1–18, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1080/23800127.2018.1493063.
[39]
P. Adey, ‘If Mobility is Everything Then it is Nothing: Towards a Relational Politics of (Im) mobilities’, Mobilities, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 75–94, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17450100500489080
[40]
M. Sheller and J. Urry, ‘The New Mobilities Paradigm’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 207–226, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1068/a37268.
[41]
M. Sheller and J. Urry, ‘Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm’, Applied Mobilities, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–25, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216.
[42]
J. C. Alexander, ‘Culture trauma, morality and solidarity’, Thesis Eleven, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 3–16, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0725513615625239.