[1]
Shaw, Richard and C. Eichbaum, ‘Chapter 5: Cabinet and the Prime Minister’, in Public policy in New Zealand : institutions, processes and outcomes, 3rd ed., Auckland: Pearson Education New Zealand, 2011, pp. 76–94. [Online]. Available: http://tewaharoa.victoria.ac.nz/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=requestTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=64VUW_INST21148549990002386&indx=1&recIds=64VUW_INST21148549990002386&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbrSourceidDisplay=64VUW_INST&frbrIssnDisplay=&dscnt=0&frbrRecordsSource=Primo+Local&mode=Basic&vid=VUW&lastPag=&rfnGrp=frbr&tab=all&frbrJtitleDisplay=&dstmp=1465958544118&frbg=448065858&lastPagIndx=&frbrSrt=date&frbrEissnDisplay=&fctV=448065858&cs=frb&fctN=facet_frbrgroupid&vl(freeText0)=public%20policy%20in%20new%20zealand%20%20institutions%20processes%20and%20outcomes%20%2C%20richard%20shaw
[2]
‘Cabinet Manual 2023’. Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, Cabinet Office, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.dpmc.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2023-06/cabinet-manual-2023-v2.pdf
[3]
S. Buckley and ProQuest (Firm), The prime minister and cabinet. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=1962294
[4]
Shaw, Richard and C. Eichbaum, ‘Chapter 5: Cabinet and the Prime Minister’, in Public policy in New Zealand : institutions, processes and outcomes, 3rd ed., Auckland: Pearson Education New Zealand, 2011, pp. 76–94. [Online]. Available: http://tewaharoa.victoria.ac.nz/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=requestTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=64VUW_INST21148549990002386&indx=1&recIds=64VUW_INST21148549990002386&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbrSourceidDisplay=64VUW_INST&frbrIssnDisplay=&dscnt=0&frbrRecordsSource=Primo+Local&mode=Basic&vid=VUW&lastPag=&rfnGrp=frbr&tab=all&frbrJtitleDisplay=&dstmp=1465958544118&frbg=448065858&lastPagIndx=&frbrSrt=date&frbrEissnDisplay=&fctV=448065858&cs=frb&fctN=facet_frbrgroupid&vl(freeText0)=public%20policy%20in%20new%20zealand%20%20institutions%20processes%20and%20outcomes%20%2C%20richard%20shaw
[5]
D. Marsh and G. Stoker, ‘Introduction’, in Theory and methods in political science, 3rd ed., vol. Political analysis, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, pp. 1–12.
[6]
R. Malone, ‘Chapter 3.4: The Executive’, in New Zealand government and politics, Sixth edition., J. Hayward, Ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 153–164. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=5836520&ppg=177
[7]
P. DUNLEAVY and R. A. W. RHODES, ‘CORE EXECUTIVE STUDIES IN BRITAIN’, Public Administration, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 3–28, Mar. 1990, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1990.tb00744.x.
[8]
P. M. Weller, Cabinet government in Australia, 1901-2006: practice, principles, performance. Sydney: UNSW Press, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/detail.action?docID=308493&
[9]
R. A. W. Rhodes and P. Weller, ‘Chapter 1: Westminster transplanted and Westminster implanted: exploring political change’, in Westminster legacies: democracy and responsible government in Asia and the Pacific, vol. ANZSOG program on government, politics and public management, Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales Press, 2005, pp. 1–12. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=291974&ppg=14
[10]
O. Gay and T. Powell, ‘The collective responsibility of ministers: an outline of the issues’. House of Commons Library, 2004. [Online]. Available: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP04-82
[11]
N. White, ‘Deconstructing Cabinet Collective Responsibility’, Policy Quarterly, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 4–11, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/pq/article/view/4253
[12]
R. Mulgan, ‘“Accountability”: An Ever-Expanding Concept?’, Public Administration, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 555–573, 2000, doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00218.
[13]
J. Boston, S. Church, and T. Bale, ‘The Impact of Proportional Representation on Government Effectiveness: The New Zealand Experience’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 7–22, 2003, doi: 10.1111/j..2003.00345.x.
[14]
‘Labour NZ Greens Support and Confidence Agreement’. [Online]. Available: https://www.greens.org.nz/sites/default/files/NZLP%20%26%20GP%20C%26S%20Agreement%20FINAL.PDF
[15]
‘Labour NZ First Coalition Agreement’. [Online]. Available: http://img.scoop.co.nz/media/pdfs/1710/362429780LabourandNewZealandFirstCoalitionAgreement.pdf
[16]
O. Gay and T. Powell, ‘Individual ministerial responsibility-issues and examples’. House of Commons Library, 2004. [Online]. Available: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP04-31
[17]
J. Uhr, ‘Ministerial responsibility in Australia: 2005’. 2005 Constitutional Law Conference, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, 2005. [Online]. Available: http://www.gtcentre.unsw.edu.au/sites/gtcentre.unsw.edu.au/files/mdocs/5_JohnUhr.pdf
[18]
E. M. McLeay, ‘Chapter 9: Taking responsibility’, in The Cabinet and political power in New Zealand, vol. Oxford readings in New Zealand politics, Auckland, N.Z.: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 186–204.
[19]
R. Gregory, ‘A New Zealand Tragedy: Problems of Political Responsibility’, Governance, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 231–240, 1998, doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00067.
[20]
C. Gwyn, ‘Report into the release of information by the New Zealand Security and Intelligence Service in July-August 2011 [release of information about the Leader of the Opposition to Cameron Slater]’. Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.igis.govt.nz/publications/investigation-reports/
[21]
L. Chisholm, ‘Under the Inquiries Act 2013: A Government Inquiry Into: Allegations regarding the Honourable Judith Collins and a former Director of the Serious Fraud Office: Report’. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/government-inquiry-report-released
[22]
R. Shaw, New Zealand government and politics, Sixth edition. South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/VUW/detail.action?docID=5836520
[23]
P. Aucoin, ‘New Political Governance in Westminster Systems: Impartial Public Admninistration and Management Performance at Risk’, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 177–199, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01569.x/epdf
[24]
A. Kibblewhite, ‘Andrew Kibblewhite, 26 May : Institute of Public Administration New Zealand’. May 26, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.ipanz.org.nz/Section?Action=View&Section_id=101
[25]
R. Shaw and C. Eichbaum, ‘Ministers, Minders and the Core Executive: Why Ministers Appoint Political Advisers in Westminster Contexts’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 584–616, 2014, doi: 10.1093/pa/gss080.
[26]
M. Everett and E. Faulkner, ‘Special Advisers’. UK House of Commons, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN03813
[27]
R. S. Parker, ‘The Administrative Vocation’, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 336–345, 1989, [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1989.tb02234.x/epdf
[28]
M. Burch and I. Holliday, The British cabinet system. New York: Prentice Hall, 1996.
[29]
‘Iraq Inquiry - The Chilcot Report’. UK House of Commons, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/
[30]
J. Uhr, ‘Chapter 7 National security and government: At war with ethics’, in Terms of trust: arguments over ethics in Australian government, Sydney: UNSW Press, 2005, pp. 159–185. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=291972&ppg=160
[31]
K. Dowding, ‘The Prime Ministerialisation of the British Prime Minister’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 617–635, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1093/pa/gss007.
[32]
P. Webb and T. Poguntke, ‘The Presidentialisation of Politics Thesis Defended’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 646–654, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1093/pa/gss059.
[33]
R. Heffernan, ‘There’s No Need for the “-isation”: The Prime Minister Is Merely Prime Ministerial’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 636–645, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1093/pa/gss058.
[34]
R. Heffernan, ‘There’s No Need for the “-isation”: The Prime Minister Is Merely Prime Ministerial’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 636–645, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1093/pa/gss058.
[35]
M. Foley, ‘Prime Ministerialisation and Presidential Analogies: A Certain Difference in Interpretive Evolution’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 655–662, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1093/pa/gss060.
[36]
R. A. W. Rhodes, ‘Understanding Governance: Ten Years On’, Organization Studies, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1243–1264, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0170840607076586.
[37]
M. Bevir and R. A. W. Rhodes, ‘Prime Ministers, Presidentialism and Westminster Smokescreens’, Political Studies, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 671–690, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00632.x.
[38]
S. Bell, A. Hindmoor, and F. Mols, ‘Persuasion as Governance: A State-Centric Relational Perspective’, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 851–870, 2010, [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01838.x/epdf