[1]
Hazel Petrie Chiefs of industry: Māori tribal enterprise in early colonial New Zealand (Auckland University Press, Auckland, 2006) ch 3.
[2]
Chase, Claude, ‘Mapping of dispute settlement mechanisms in regional trade agreements: Innovative or variations on a theme?’, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/zbwwtowps/ersd201307.htm
[3]
M. Q. ZANG, ‘When the Multilateral Meets the Regionals: Regional Trade Agreements at WTO Dispute Settlement’, World Trade Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 33–61, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1017/S1474745618000010.
[4]
Marceau, Gabrielle, ‘The WTO’s Influence on Other Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: A Lighthouse in the Storm of Fragmentation’, Journal of World Trade, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 481–574, [Online]. Available: https://tewaharoa.victoria.ac.nz/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest1459411561&context=PC&vid=VUWNUI&lang=en_NZ&search_scope=64VUW_ALL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=all&query=any,contains,wto%27s%20influence%20on%20other%20dispute%20settlement%20instruments&sortby=rank&facet=rtype,exclude,newspaper_articles&facet=rtype,exclude,reviews
[5]
G. Marceau and J. Wyatt, ‘Dispute Settlement Regimes Intermingled: Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–95, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idp009.
[6]
C. Henckels, ‘Overcoming Jurisdictional Isolationism at the WTO-FTA Nexus: A Potential Approach for the WTO’, European Journal of International Law, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 571–599, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1093/ejil/chn025.
[7]
K. Kwak and G. Marceau, ‘Overlaps and Conflicts of Jurisdiction between the World Trade Organization and Regional Trade Agreements’, in Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System, L. Bartels and F. Ortino, Eds. Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 465–524. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206995.003.0021.
[8]
Pauwelyn, J.; Salles, L., ‘Forum Shopping before International Tribunals: (Real) Concerns, (Im)Possible Solutions’, Cornell International Law Journal, 2009, [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/cintl42&id=81
[9]
‘Waitangi Tribunal reports | Waitangi Tribunal’. https://www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz/publications-and-resources/waitangi-tribunal-reports/
[10]
B. Cumings, ‘The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy: industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consequences’, International Organization, vol. 38, no. 01, Dec. 1984, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300004264.
[11]
Bernard, M, ‘BEYOND PRODUCT CYCLES AND FLYING GEESE - REGIONALIZATION, HIERARCHY, AND THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF EAST-ASIA’, World Politics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 171–209, [Online]. Available: https://tewaharoa.victoria.ac.nz/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_wosA1995QB40300001&context=PC&vid=VUWNUI&lang=en_NZ&search_scope=64VUW_ALL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=all&query=any,contains,Beyond%20Product%20Cycles%20and%20Flying%20Geese:%20Regionalization,%20Hierarchy,%20and%20the%20Industrialization%20of%20East%20Asia%20-%20Mitchell%20Bernard%20and%20John%20Ravenhill%201995&sortby=rank&offset=0
[12]
H. W.-C. Yeung and ProQuest (Firm), Strategic coupling: East Asian industrial transformation in the new global economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/VUW/detail.action?docID=4526406
[13]
‘Working Papers’. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/researchcentres/csgr/papers/
[14]
The Political Economy of Asian Regionalism. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-4-431-54568-2
[15]
L. H. Yeo, ‘Institutional regionalism versus networked regionalism: Europe and Asia compared’, International Politics, vol. 47, no. 3–4, pp. 324–337, May 2010, doi: 10.1057/ip.2010.18.
[16]
‘Chad P Brown and Soumaya Keynes “Trade Talks Episode 12: How to Save a (Pacific) Trade Deal” (16 November 2017) Peterson Institute for International Economics ’. https://piie.com/experts/peterson-perspectives/trade-talks-episode-12-how-save-pacific-trade-deal
[17]
M. K. Lewis, ‘Mega-FTAs and Plurilateral Trade Agreements: Implications for the Asia-Pacific’, in Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law Rule-Making, J. Chaisse, H. Gao, and C. Lo, Eds. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017, pp. 419–433. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-6731-0_24.
[18]
Hsieh, P. L., ‘Pasha L Hsieh “Against Populist Isolationism: New Asian Regionalism and Global South Powers in International Economic Law” (2018) 51 Cornell Intl L J 683’, Cornell International Law Journal, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/cintl51&id=711
[19]
‘“SJM asks India to quit RCEP talks, says pact will hurt farm, dairy sectors” The Hindu Business Link (online ed, New Delhi, 10 January 2019)’. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/sjm-asks-india-to-quit-rcep-talks-says-pact-will-hurt-farm-dairy-sectors/article25961950.ece
[20]
‘Pattrick Smellie “NZ, Australia face pressure to exit RCEP negotiations” (2 October 2018) Scoop’. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1810/S00078/nz-australia-face-pressure-to-exit-rcep-negotiations.htm
[21]
‘Barbara C Matthews, Earl Anthony Wayne and Cecilia Pan “Trade in Services Agreement: A Way Out of the Trade War?” (July 23, 2018) Atlantic Council’. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/trade-in-services-agreement-a-way-out-of-the-trade-war
[22]
‘Alex Hunt and Brian Wheeler “Brexit: All you need to know about the UK leaving the EU” (8 April 2019) BBC’. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-32810887
[23]
‘Douglas A Rediker “The Brexit options, explained” (5 January 2018) Brookings’. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/01/05/the-brexit-options-explained/
[24]
‘Brexit Options: Possible Outcomes’. https://brexitoptions.co.uk/diagram.html
[25]
‘Chris Morris “Brexit: What is the ‘no deal’ WTO option?” (25 March 2019) BBC’. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-45112872
[26]
Karen Jackson, ‘Karen Jackson and Oleksandr Shepotylo “No deal? Seven reasons why a WTO-only Brexit would be bad fro Britain” (24 August 2018) The Conversation’, The Conversation, [Online]. Available: https://theconversation.com/no-deal-seven-reasons-why-a-wto-only-brexit-would-be-bad-for-britain-102009
[27]
‘New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade “Brexit: what it means for New Zealand” (2019)’. https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/europe/united-kingdom/brexit-the-uk-and-europe/
[28]
‘New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade “PACER Plus” (2019)’. https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-concluded-but-not-in-force/pacer/
[29]
‘New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade “PACER Plus full text” (2019)’. https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-concluded-but-not-in-force/pacer/pacer-plus-full-text/
[30]
‘Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat Outcomes and Outlook 2018-2019 (APEC#218-SE-05.3, February 2019)’. [Online]. Available: http://apec.org/Publications/2019/02/Outcomes-and-Outlook-2018-2019
[31]
‘Past, present and future of APEC at 30 | East Asia Forum’. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2018/12/29/past-present-and-future-of-apec-at-30/
[32]
Edited by Axel Marx, Jan Wouters, Glenn Rayp and Laura Beke, ‘Conclusion: which way to enforcement? : Global Governance of Labour Rights’, in Global Governance of Labour Rights, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781784711450/9781784711450.00020.xml?rskey=uNWnCa&result=1
[33]
R. Croucher, M. Houssart, L. Miles, and P. James, ‘Legal Sanction, International Organisations and the Bangladesh Accord’, Industrial Law Journal, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwz003.
[34]
‘WHAT INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL JUSTICE IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY?’ [Online]. Available: http://islssl.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Supiot_CapeTown_September_2015_EN.pdf
[35]
M. E. Margulis, ‘Negotiating from the margins: how the UN shapes the rules of the WTO’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 364–391, May 2018, doi: 10.1080/09692290.2018.1447982.
[36]
Footer, M. E., ‘The (Re)turn to Soft law in Reconciling the Antinomies in WTO Law’, Melbourne Journal of International Law,, [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/meljil11&id=253
[37]
‘Resolutions Adopted on the Report of the AD HOC Committee of the Sixth Special Session’, Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. v–vii, 2015, doi: 10.1353/hum.2015.0005.
[38]
J. Bockman, ‘Socialist Globalization against Capitalist Neocolonialism: The Economic Ideas behind the New International Economic Order’, Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 109–128, 2015, doi: 10.1353/hum.2015.0010.
[39]
V. Ogle, ‘State Rights against Private Capital: The "New International Economic Order” and the Struggle over Aid, Trade, and Foreign Investment, 1962–1981’, Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 211–234, 2014, doi: 10.1353/hum.2014.0018.
[40]
D. A. IRWIN, Free Trade under Fire. Princeton University Press, 2015. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt9qh0ch.
[41]
Kyle Bagwell and Robert W. Staiger, ‘The World Trade Organization: Theory and Practice’, Annual Review of Economics, vol. 2, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42940329?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[42]
‘Is the WTO passe ?’, Policy Research Working Paper Series, [Online]. Available: https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/7304.html
[43]
D. A. IRWIN, Free Trade under Fire. Princeton University Press, 2015. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt9qh0ch.
[44]
Kyle Bagwell and Robert W. Staiger, ‘The World Trade Organization: Theory and Practice’, Annual Review of Economics, vol. 2, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42940329?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[45]
‘Is the WTO passe ?’, Policy Research Working Paper Series, [Online]. Available: https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/7304.html
[46]
‘The Economics of Investor Protection: ISDS versus National Treatment’, CESifo Working Paper Series, [Online]. Available: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_5766.html
[47]
‘Closing Pandora’s Box: The Growing Abuse of the National Security Rationale for Restricting Trade | Cato Institute’, [Online]. Available: https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/closing-pandoras-box-growing-abuse-national-security-rationale
[48]
‘Blacklisting Huawei Could Cost Trillions, so Let’s Look Before We Leap | Cato Institute’, [Online]. Available: https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/blacklisting-huawei-could-cost-trillions-so-lets-look-we-leap
[49]
‘Who’s Winning the US-China Trade War? It’s Not the United States or China | PIIE’, [Online]. Available: https://www.piie.com/blogs/trade-and-investment-policy-watch/whos-winning-us-china-trade-war-its-not-united-states-or
[50]
‘Trump’s Trade War Timeline: An Up-to-Date Guide | PIIE’, [Online]. Available: https://www.piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/trump-trade-war-china-date-guide
[51]
‘China Is Raising Tariffs on the United States and Lowering Them for Everybody Else | PIIE’, [Online]. Available: https://www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/china-raising-tariffs-united-states-and-lowering-them-everybody-else
[52]
‘93: US Trade Policy Before Trump, with Ambassador Michael Froman’. [Online]. Available: https://www.tradetalkspodcast.com/podcast/93-us-trade-policy-before-trump-with-ambassador-michael-froman/
[53]
‘Trade in Trouble: How Asia Can Lead | Asia Society’. [Online]. Available: https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/trade-trouble-how-asia-can-lead
[54]
‘What’s Next for U.S.-China Trade? | Asia Society’. [Online]. Available: https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/whats-next-us-china-trade
[55]
‘The Kindleberger Trap | Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs’, [Online]. Available: https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/kindleberger-trap
[56]
‘Thucydides, V.84-116 (The Melian Dialogue, 416 B.C.)’. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/classics/students/modules/introhist/usefuldocuments/
[57]
B. J. Cohen, International political economy. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 2005.
[58]
E. D. Mansfield and D. C. Mutz, ‘Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety’, International Organization, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 425–457, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1017/S0020818309090158.
[59]
‘Jeffry Frieden. 2018. "The backlash against globalization and the future of the international economic order.” Prepared for The Next Phase of Globalization: Capitalism and Inequality in the Industrialized World.’, [Online]. Available: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/jfrieden/files/frieden_future_feb2018.pdf
[60]
‘Peter S. Goodman "More Wealth, More Jobs, but Not for Everyone: What Fuels the Backlash on Trade”. The New York Times, Sept. 28, 2016’, [Online]. Available: https://static01.nyt.com/images/blogs/learning/pdf/2016/MoreWealthMoreJobsButNotForEveryone.pdf
[61]
‘Modernising our trade policy with Trade for All: have your say | Beehive.govt.nz’. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/modernising-our-trade-policy-trade-all-have-your-say
