Aicken & Son v Bradley [1916] NZLR 659 (SC), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Apple Fields Ltd v Damesh Holdings Ltd [2001] 2 NZLR 586 (CA), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
‘Armory v Delamirie (1722) 1 Stra 505 (KB)’, n.d. https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=g&serNum=1753068666&pubNum=4930&originatingDoc=I8FC9E02051FD11DC8D33E7B51BBD161E&refType=UD&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=(sc.DocLink)&sp=nz-wln-VicUWell.
Ashby v Tolhurst [1937] 2 KB 242 (CA) (n.d.).
‘Asher v Whitlock (1865) LR 1 QB 1’. Law Journal Reports. New Series, 1832.
Assets v Mere Roihi [1905] AC 176 (PC). (n.d.).
Attorney-General v Ngati Apa [2003] 3 NZLR 643 (CA), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) [1988] 164 CLR 604, CLR (n.d.).
Barry v Fenton [1952] NZLR 990 (SC), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Bartle v GE Custodians [2010] NZCA 174, [2010] 3 NZLR 601, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Barton Ginger and Company, Limited v Wellington Harbour Board [1951] NZLR 673, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Bay Flight 2012 Ltd v Flight Care Ltd [2012] NZAR 436 (n.d.).
Beale v Tihema Te Hau (1905) 24 NZLR 883 (SC). (n.d.).
Bennion, Tom. New Zealand Land Law. 2nd ed. Wellington [N.Z.]: Brookers, 2009.
———. New Zealand Land Law. 2nd ed. Wellington [N.Z.]: Brookers, 2009.
Biggs v Hoddinott [1898] 2 Ch 307 (Engl. CA) (n.d.).
Boatspray Ltd v The Ship "Shengala” HC Auckland, CIV-2009-404-002524, 28 August 2009 (n.d.).
Bognuda v Upton & Shearer Ltd [1972] NZLR 741 (CA), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Boyd v Mayor of Wellington [1924] NZLR 1174 (CA) (Stout CJ) (n.d.).
Boyer v Mccracken [2017] NZHC 755 (n.d.).
Breskvar v Wall (1971) 126 CLR 376 (HCA). (n.d.).
Brian Green Properties (1971) Ltd v Bindon Holdings Ltd [2016] NZHC 1993 (n.d.).
Brian Green Properties (1971) Ltd v Bindon Holdings Ltd [2016] NZHC 2847 (n.d.).
Buckinghamshire Council v Moran [1990] Ch 623 (CA) (n.d.).
Burrows, Andrew, ed. ‘William Swadling "Property: General Principles” in Andrew Burrows (Ed) English Private Law (2nd Ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007)’. In English Private Law. Oxford University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661770.003.0004.
Cassegrain v Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 2. (n.d.).
City of London Corp v Fell [1993] QB 589 (n.d.).
Clarke, Alison, and Paul Kohler. Alison Clarke and Paul Kohler Property Law: Commentary and Materials (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005) at 259–261. Vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vuw/reader.action?docID=243990&ppg=307.
Cohen v Sellar [1926] 1 KB 536 (n.d.).
Crown Money Corporation Ltd v Pink-Martin HC Auckland CIV-2008-404-000297, 5 September 2008 (n.d.).
Davey v Baker [2016] NZCA 313 (n.d.).
Davis v Lethbridge [1976] 1 NZLR 689, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Dollars and Sense Finance Ltd v Nathan (2008) 9 NZCPR 116 (SC). (n.d.).
Doodeward v Spence (1908) 6 CLR 406 (HCA) (n.d.).
Downsview Nominees Ltd v First City Corporation Ltd [1993] 1 NZLR 513 (JC), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Duncan v McDonald [1997] 3 NZLR 669 (CA). (n.d.).
Edwards v Newland & Co [1950] 2 KB 534 (CA) (n.d.).
Efstratiou v Glantschnig [1972] NZLR 594 (CA). (n.d.).
Fairclough v Swan Brewery Co Ltd [1912] AC 565 (HL) (n.d.).
Fatac Ltd (In Liquidation) v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2002] 3 NZLR 648, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
‘Felix S Cohen "Dialogue on Private Property” (1954–1955) Rutgers L Rev 357’, n.d. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5362&context=fss_papers.
Frazer v Walker [1967] 1 AC 569 (PC) (headnote) (n.d.).
GE Custodians v Bartle [2010] NZSC 146, [2011] 2 NZLR 31, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
German v Chapman [1877] 7 Ch. D. 271 (n.d.).
Gibbs v Messer  [1891] AC 248 (PC). (n.d.).
Graham v Portacom New Zealand Ltd [2004] 2 NZLR 528 (HC)., New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Greenslade v Honeymoon Bay Holdings [2012] NZHC 3346 (n.d.).
Hammond, R. G. Personal Property: Commentary and Materials. Rev. ed. Auckland, N.Z.: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Harnden v Collins [2010] 2 NZLR 273, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Harris v Fitzmaurice [1956] NZLR 975 (SC) (n.d.).
Haywood v The Brunswick Permanent Benefit Building Society [1881] 8 QBD 403 (n.d.).
‘Hill v Tupper (1863) 2 H & C 122’, n.d. https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/Blob/I41F557C0BE6F11E08907CB01B3922728.pdf?targetType=inline&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentImage&uniqueId=96d9aca9-8055-42a2-96f2-4b8cd3fd10f5&contextData=(sc.DocLink)&sp=nz-wln-VicUWell.
Hinde, G. W., N. R. Campbell, Peter Twist, and G. W. Hinde. Principles of Real Property Law. Academic ed. Wellington [N.Z.]: LexisNexis, 2007.
Housing Corporation v Māori Trustee [1988] 2 NZLR 662 (HC). (n.d.).
J S Brookshank & Co (Australasia) Ltd v EXFTX Ltd [2009] NZCA 122 (n.d.).
Jansen v Mansor (1995) 3 NZConvC 192,111 (CA) (n.d.).
Jocelyn Edwards; Re the estate of the late Mark Edwards [2011] NSWSC 478, Health lawPersonal property (n.d.).
Jones v Morgan  [2001] EWCA Civ 995 (Engl. CA) (n.d.).
Kalmac Property Consultants Ltd v Delicious Foods Ltd [1974] 2 NZLR 631, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Kingfish Lodge (1993) Ltd v Archer [2000] 3 NZLR 364 (CA), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne [1939] Ch 441 (Engl. CA) (n.d.).
Knowles v Henderson [1991] 1 NZ ConvC 190,704. (n.d.).
Knowles v Henderson [1992] 2 NZ ConvC 191,355. (n.d.).
Land Transfer Amendment Act 1963, s3 (n.d.). http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1963/0061/1.0/DLM349467.html.
Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd [1994] 1 AC 85 (HL) (n.d.).
‘Lindy Wilmott and Bill Duncan "Clogging the Equity of Redemption: An Outmoded Concept?” (2005) 2 (1) Law and Justice Journal 35’. Law and Justice Journal, n.d. http://tewaharoa.victoria.ac.nz/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=4&tabs=viewOnlineTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_informit_apaft742996396259218&indx=1&recIds=TN_informit_apaft742996396259218&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=4&vid=VUW&mode=Basic&mulExcFctN=facet_rtype&mulExcFctN=facet_rtype&fctExcV=reviews&fctExcV=newspaper_articles&tab=all&rfnExcGrp=%3F&rfnExcGrp=%3F&dscnt=0&vl(freeText0)=Lindy%20Wilmott%20and%20Bill%20Duncan%20%E2%80%9CClogging%20the%20Equity%20of%20Redemption%3A%20an%20outmoded%20Concept&dstmp=1471765408912.
Lockwood Buildings Ltd v Trust Bank Canterbury Ltd [1995] 1 NZLR 22 (CA), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Loke Yew v Port Swettenham Rubber Company [1913] AC 493 (n.d.).
Mabo v Queensland (1992) 175 CLR 1 (HCA), CLR (n.d.).
Macken v Jervis [2014] NZHC 3408 (n.d.).
McEvoy v McEvoy HC Christchurch CIV-2007-409-002946, 22 May 2008 (n.d.).
Merrill, Thomas W., and Henry E. Smith. The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Property. Vol. Oxford introductions to U.S. law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Miller v Minister of Mines [1963] NZLR 560 (PC). (n.d.).
Moore v. Regents of University of California | Westlaw (n.d.).
Murray v BC Group (2003) Ltd [2010] NZCA 163, [2010] 3 NZLR 590, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
National Crime Authority v Flack [1998] 156 ALR 501 (FCA), FCR (n.d.).
Nordern v Blueport Enterprises Ltd and Others [1996] 3 NZLR 450 (HC), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Official Assignee of Palmer v Sharpe [1921] NZLR 460, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
P & A Swift Investments v Combined English Stores Group Plc [1989] AC 632 (n.d.).
Parker v British Airways [1982] 1 QB 1004; [1982] 1 All ER 834; [1982] 2 WLR 503. (n.d.).
Peacock v Custins [2002] 1 WLR 1815 (n.d.).
Percival v Dunn (1885) 29 Ch 128 (n.d.).
Personal Property Securities Act 1999 (n.d.). http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1999/0126/latest/whole.html.
Phillips v Brooks [1919] 2 KB 243 (KB) (n.d.).
Polymer Systems (1999) Ltd v Montgomerie [2002] 3 NZLR 383, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Power Farming NZ Ltd v McCaw Contracting Ltd [2017] NZHC 441 (n.d.).
Property Law Act 1952, s 130 (n.d.). http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1952/0051/latest/DLM267065.html.
Public Trust v Ottow [2009] 10 NZCPR 879 (HC) (n.d.).
Rabobank New Zealand Ltd v McAnulty [2011] 3 NZLR 192, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Re Ellenborough Park [1956] Ch 131 (n.d.).
Regis Property Co Ltd v Dudley [1959] AC 370 (n.d.).
Richard Boast The Native Land Court 1862-1887: A Historical Study, Cases, and Commentary (Brookers NZ, Auckland, 2013) 756–781, n.d.
Richard Calnan Proprietary Rights and Insolvency (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010) at [2.01]–[2.29]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, n.d.
Robot Arenas v Waterfield [2010] EWHC 115 (QB) (n.d.).
S Rowton Simpson. ‘The Torrens System’. In Land Law and Registration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
Salt of the Earth v Finer [2008] NZHC 1137, (2008) 9 NZCPR 563 (HC) (n.d.).
‘Simon Roberts "More Lost Than Found” (1982) 45 MLR 683’, n.d. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1982.tb02501.x/epdf.
Smith v Jones [2014] NZHC 2674 (n.d.).
Southland Hospital Board v Perkins Estate [1986] 1 NZLR 373, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Southwark BC v Mills [1999] 4 All ER 449 (n.d.).
Squally Cove Forestry Partnership v Wagg [2013] 3 NZLR 793, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Stanhill Pty Ltd v Jackson [2005] 12 VR 224, Real propertyRestrictive covenantsProceedings to discharge, extinguish or modifyRestriction obsolete or reasonable user of land impededVictoriaReal propertyRestrictive covenantsProceedings to discharge, extinguish or modifyNo substantial injuryVictoria (n.d.).
Stiassny v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2013] 1 NZLR 453, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
StockCo Ltd v Gibson [2012] NZCA 330; [2012] 10 NZBLC 99-709 (n.d.).
Stockco Ltd v Walker  [2011] NZAR 669 (n.d.).
Sutton v O’Kane [1973] 2 NZLR 304 (CA). (n.d.).
T A Dallaca Ltd v PDL Industries Ltd [1992] 3 NZLR 88 (HC), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Tait, Emma. ‘Liability of Lessees and Assignees of Commercial Leases in New Zealand.’ Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 39, no. 2 (2008). http://tewaharoa.victoria.ac.nz/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=3&tabs=viewOnlineTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_gale_ofa189636828&indx=1&recIds=TN_gale_ofa189636828&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=3&dscnt=0&vl(547469497UI0)=any&mode=Basic&vid=VUW&tab=all&dstmp=1492334086973&frbg=&frbrVersion=3&viewAllItemsClicked=false&scp.scps=scope:(JNZS_vuw_ac_nz),scope:(Exams_vuw_ac_nz),scope:(NZJIR_vuw_ac_nz),scope:(researcharchive_vuw_ac_nz),scope:(NZREF_vuw_ac_nz),scope:(AJL_vuw_ac_nz),scope:(LEW_vuw_ac_nz),scope:(KOTARE_vuw_ac_nz),scope:(NZAROE_vuw_ac_nz),scope:(64VUW),primo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&srt=rank&dum=true&selectedLocation=&vl(freeText0)=emma tait.
Taitapu Gold Estates v Prouse [1916] NZLR 825 (HC). (n.d.).
Tamworth Industries Ltd v Attorney-General [1991] 3 NZLR 616 (HC), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
The Pioneer Container [1994] 2 AC 324 (PC) (n.d.).
‘Thomas v Times Book Co Ltd [1966] 1 WLR 911 (Ch)’, n.d. http://libguides.victoria.ac.nz/law.
Tim Murphy, Simon Roberts and Tatiana Flessas Understanding Property Law (4th Ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2004) at 1–5. 4th ed. Vol. Understanding law. London: Sweet & Maxwell, n.d.
Toll Logistics (NZ) Ltd v McKay [2011] 2 NZLR 601, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Tram Lease Ltd v Croad [2003] 2 NZLR 461 (CA), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 WLR 1349 (n.d.).
Tulk v Moxhay (1848) 41 ER 1143 (n.d.).
Wellington Racing Club v Symons [1923] NZLR 1, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Westpac New Zealand Ltd v Clark [2010] 1 NZLR 82 (SC) (Elias CJ) (n.d.).
Westpac v Clark [2009] NZSC 73, [2010] 1 NZLR 82 (SC), New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Williams v Williams [1956] NZLR 970, New Zealand Law Reports (n.d.).
Wood Bay Enterprises Ltd v Wise [2012] NZHC 1136 (n.d.).
‘Yanner v Eaton [1999] HCA 53’, n.d. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1999/53.html.
Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 37 (n.d.).
Zhao v Huang [2014] NZHC 132 (n.d.).